House Set To Hold First Floor Vote In Impeachment Inquiry | The 11th Hour | MSNBC


GETS UNDER WAY ON A WEDNESDAY EVENING. EVENING. WELL, GOOD EVENING ONCE AGAIN WELL, GOOD EVENING ONCE AGAIN FROM OUR NBC NEWS HEADQUARTERS FROM OUR NBC NEWS HEADQUARTERS HERE IN NEW YORK. HERE IN NEW YORK. DAY 1,014 OF THIS TRUMP DAY 1,014 OF THIS TRUMP ADMINISTRATION. ADMINISTRATION. ANOTHER DAY OF NEARLY HOURLY ANOTHER DAY OF NEARLY HOURLY DEVELOPMENTS IN THE KRIMIMPEACHM DEVELOPMENTS IN THE KRIMIMPEACHM INQUIRY INCLUDING MORE INQUIRY INCLUDING MORE TESTIMONY, AND THE CLOCK IS TESTIMONY, AND THE CLOCK IS UNDER WAY TOWARD TOMORROW’S UNDER WAY TOWARD TOMORROW’S INITIAL VOTE OF THE HOUSE. INITIAL VOTE OF THE HOUSE. THIS IS A RESOLUTION TO LAY OUT THIS IS A RESOLUTION TO LAY OUT THE IMPEACHMENT PROCESS IN THE IMPEACHMENT PROCESS IN EFFECT. EFFECT. IN THE MEANTIME AND LOOKING IN THE MEANTIME AND LOOKING AHEAD TONIGHT, HOUSE DEMOCRATS AHEAD TONIGHT, HOUSE DEMOCRATS HAVE TOLD FORMER NATIONAL HAVE TOLD FORMER NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER JOHN BOLTON SECURITY ADVISER JOHN BOLTON THEY WANT HIM TO TESTIFY ABOUT THEY WANT HIM TO TESTIFY ABOUT THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE AND THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE AND UKRAINE. UKRAINE. TONIGHT BOLTON’S LAWYER SAYS TONIGHT BOLTON’S LAWYER SAYS HE’S NOT WILLING TO APPEAR HE’S NOT WILLING TO APPEAR VOLUNTARILY BUT THAT HE STANDS VOLUNTARILY BUT THAT HE STANDS READY TO ACCEPT A SUBPOENA. READY TO ACCEPT A SUBPOENA. FIONA HILL, WHO WORKED FOR FIONA HILL, WHO WORKED FOR BOLTON, REPORTEDLY TESTIFIED BOLTON, REPORTEDLY TESTIFIED THAT HE REFERRED TO UKRAINE THAT HE REFERRED TO UKRAINE PRESSURE CAMPAIGN AS A “DRUG PRESSURE CAMPAIGN AS A “DRUG DEAL” AND SPOKE OF RUDY GIULIANI DEAL” AND SPOKE OF RUDY GIULIANI AS A HAND GRENADE WHO’S GOING TO AS A HAND GRENADE WHO’S GOING TO BLOW EVERYBODY UP. BLOW EVERYBODY UP. WELL, TOMORROW CONGRESSIONAL WELL, TOMORROW CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATORS WILL BE HEARING INVESTIGATORS WILL BE HEARING FROM ANOTHER MEMBER OF BOLTON’S FROM ANOTHER MEMBER OF BOLTON’S NATIONAL SECURITY TEAM, A GUY BY NATIONAL SECURITY TEAM, A GUY BY THE NAME OF TIM MORRISON. THE NAME OF TIM MORRISON. HE LISTENED IN ON THAT NOW HE LISTENED IN ON THAT NOW INFAMOUS JULY 25 PHONE CALL WITH INFAMOUS JULY 25 PHONE CALL WITH THE PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE. THE PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE. LAST WEEK AMBASSADOR BILL TAYLOR LAST WEEK AMBASSADOR BILL TAYLOR TESTIFIED THAT MORRISON TOLD HIM TESTIFIED THAT MORRISON TOLD HIM ABOUT THIS DECISION TO BLOCK ABOUT THIS DECISION TO BLOCK NEARLY $400 MILLION IN MILITARY NEARLY $400 MILLION IN MILITARY AID THAT OUR CONGRESS HAD AID THAT OUR CONGRESS HAD APPROVED TO GO TO UKRAINE UNTIL APPROVED TO GO TO UKRAINE UNTIL INVESTIGATIONS WERE LAUNCHED INVESTIGATIONS WERE LAUNCHED INTO THE BIDENS. INTO THE BIDENS. WELL, LATE THIS AFTERNOON THERE WELL, LATE THIS AFTERNOON THERE WAS A NOTABLE DEVELOPMENT WHEN WAS A NOTABLE DEVELOPMENT WHEN WE LEARNED THAT MR. MORRISON ON WE LEARNED THAT MR. MORRISON ON THE EVE OF HIS TESTIMONY IS IN THE EVE OF HIS TESTIMONY IS IN FACT QUITH HIS JOB AS — AT THE FACT QUITH HIS JOB AS — AT THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL. NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL. HE’LL BE GIVING HIS CLOSED-DOOR HE’LL BE GIVING HIS CLOSED-DOOR DEPOSITION AS THE HOUSE DEPOSITION AS THE HOUSE RESOLUTION IS BROUGHT UP FOR RESOLUTION IS BROUGHT UP FOR CONSIDERATION. CONSIDERATION. THIS AFTERNOON THE RULES THIS AFTERNOON THE RULES COMMITTEE IN THE HOUSE VOTED TO COMMITTEE IN THE HOUSE VOTED TO MOVE THAT APPROVED LANGUAGE MOVE THAT APPROVED LANGUAGE FORWARD TO THE HOUSE FLOOR. FORWARD TO THE HOUSE FLOOR.>>WHEN OUR FOUNDERS DRAFTED THE>>WHEN OUR FOUNDERS DRAFTED THE CONSTITUTION MORE THAN 230 YEARS CONSTITUTION MORE THAN 230 YEARS AGO, THEY INCLUDED A PROCESS AGO, THEY INCLUDED A PROCESS THAT COULD LEAD TO REMOVING A THAT COULD LEAD TO REMOVING A PRESIDENT FROM OFFICE IF HE OR PRESIDENT FROM OFFICE IF HE OR SHE ABUSED THEIR POWER. SHE ABUSED THEIR POWER. THIS CONGRESS WITH OUR EXISTING THIS CONGRESS WITH OUR EXISTING AUTHORITY UNDER THE CONSTITUTION AUTHORITY UNDER THE CONSTITUTION AND THE RULES OF THE HOUSE IS IN AND THE RULES OF THE HOUSE IS IN THE MIDST OF AN IMPEACHMENT THE MIDST OF AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY RIGHT NOW. INQUIRY RIGHT NOW. I DON’T KNOW WHETHER PRESIDENT I DON’T KNOW WHETHER PRESIDENT TRUMP WILL BE IMPEACHED. TRUMP WILL BE IMPEACHED. ONLY THE FACTS AND HOW WE ONLY THE FACTS AND HOW WE RESPOND TO THEM WILL DICTATE RESPOND TO THEM WILL DICTATE THAT. THAT. BUT I CAN TELL YOU THIS. BUT I CAN TELL YOU THIS. THIS PROCESS DETERMINING WHETHER THIS PROCESS DETERMINING WHETHER HE SHOULD BE IMPEACHED WILL BE HE SHOULD BE IMPEACHED WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC VIEW JUST AS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC VIEW JUST AS IT SHOULD BE. IT SHOULD BE.>>CONGRESSMAN McGOVERN OF>>CONGRESSMAN McGOVERN OF MASSACHUSETTS. MASSACHUSETTS. EARLIER TODAY TWO MORE WITNESSES EARLIER TODAY TWO MORE WITNESSES TESTIFIED TO LAWMAKERS ABOUT HOW TESTIFIED TO LAWMAKERS ABOUT HOW OUTSIDERS APPEARED TO BE TRYING OUTSIDERS APPEARED TO BE TRYING TO INFLUENCE THIS TO INFLUENCE THIS ADMINISTRATION’S POLICY ON ADMINISTRATION’S POLICY ON UKRAINE. UKRAINE. STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS CATHERINE CROFT AND CHRISTOPHER CATHERINE CROFT AND CHRISTOPHER ANDERSON EACH MET BEHIND CLOSED ANDERSON EACH MET BEHIND CLOSED DOORS WITH HOUSE INVESTIGATING DOORS WITH HOUSE INVESTIGATING COMMITTEES. COMMITTEES. ANDERSON WAS SPECIAL ADVISER FOR ANDERSON WAS SPECIAL ADVISER FOR UKRAINE NEGOTIATIONS UNTIL THIS UKRAINE NEGOTIATIONS UNTIL THIS PAST JULY. PAST JULY. IN HIS OPENING STATEMENT HE SAID IN HIS OPENING STATEMENT HE SAID BOLTON WARNED HIM ABOUT RUDY’S BOLTON WARNED HIM ABOUT RUDY’S EFFORTS TO INFLUENCE TRUMP ON EFFORTS TO INFLUENCE TRUMP ON UKRAINE. UKRAINE. CROFT TOOK OVER FOR ANDERSON IN CROFT TOOK OVER FOR ANDERSON IN JULY AFTER SPEND TWOG YEARS AS A JULY AFTER SPEND TWOG YEARS AS A DIRECTOR COVERING UKRAINE OVER DIRECTOR COVERING UKRAINE OVER ON THE NATIONAL SECURITY ON THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL. COUNCIL. THIS MORNING SHE TOLD LAWMAKERS THIS MORNING SHE TOLD LAWMAKERS THAT LOBBYIST ROBERT LIVINGSTON, THAT LOBBYIST ROBERT LIVINGSTON, YOU MAY REMEMBER THIS MAN, YOU MAY REMEMBER THIS MAN, LONG-TIME REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMAN LONG-TIME REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMAN FROM LOUISIANA, HE IS THE FORMER FROM LOUISIANA, HE IS THE FORMER HOUSE SPEAKER ELECT DURING THE HOUSE SPEAKER ELECT DURING THE TIME OF PRESIDENT CLINTON’S TIME OF PRESIDENT CLINTON’S IMPEACHMENT, THAT HE PUSHED TO IMPEACHMENT, THAT HE PUSHED TO REMOVE THE ONE-TIME U.S. REMOVE THE ONE-TIME U.S. AMBASSADOR TO UKRAINE, MARIE AMBASSADOR TO UKRAINE, MARIE YOVANOVITCH, CALLING HER “AN YOVANOVITCH, CALLING HER “AN OBAMA HOLDOVER.” OBAMA HOLDOVER.” EYRE ALSO LEARNING MORE ABOUT EYRE ALSO LEARNING MORE ABOUT WHAT LIEUTENANT COLONEL WHAT LIEUTENANT COLONEL ALEXANDER VINDMAN TOLD MEMBERS ALEXANDER VINDMAN TOLD MEMBERS OF CONGRESS DURING HIS TESTIMONY OF CONGRESS DURING HIS TESTIMONY YESTERDAY. YESTERDAY. NBC NEWS REPORTS HE TESTIFIED NBC NEWS REPORTS HE TESTIFIED THAT A WHITE HOUSE MEETING THAT A WHITE HOUSE MEETING BETWEEN TRUMP AND THE PRESIDENT BETWEEN TRUMP AND THE PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE AS WELL AS THAT OF UKRAINE AS WELL AS THAT MILITARY AID PACKAGE WAS MILITARY AID PACKAGE WAS CONTINGENT ON UKRAINIAN CONTINGENT ON UKRAINIAN OFFICIALS CARRYING OUT MULTIPLE OFFICIALS CARRYING OUT MULTIPLE INVESTIGATIONS. INVESTIGATIONS. POLITICO REPORTING VINDMAN ALSO POLITICO REPORTING VINDMAN ALSO SAID AN ASSOCIATE OF REPUBLICAN SAID AN ASSOCIATE OF REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMAN DEVIN NUNES CONGRESSMAN DEVIN NUNES MISREPRESENTED HIMSELF TO TRUMP MISREPRESENTED HIMSELF TO TRUMP IN AN ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE IN AN ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE UKRAINE POLICY. UKRAINE POLICY. SOME OF THE KEY ASPECTS OF THE SOME OF THE KEY ASPECTS OF THE IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY SPECIFICALLY, WHO KNEW ABOUT SPECIFICALLY, WHO KNEW ABOUT WHAT, ALSO EMERGED TODAY DURING WHAT, ALSO EMERGED TODAY DURING A SENATE FOREIGN RELATIONS A SENATE FOREIGN RELATIONS COMMITTEE HEARING. COMMITTEE HEARING. UNDER OATH WAS THIS MAN, NUMBER UNDER OATH WAS THIS MAN, NUMBER TWO GUY AT THE STATE DEPARTMENT TWO GUY AT THE STATE DEPARTMENT UNDER POMPEO JOHN SULLIVAN. UNDER POMPEO JOHN SULLIVAN. HE IS HOPING TO BE CONFIRMED AS HE IS HOPING TO BE CONFIRMED AS THE NEXT U.S. AMBASSADOR TO THE NEXT U.S. AMBASSADOR TO RUSSIA. RUSSIA.>>DO YOU THINK IT’S EVER>>DO YOU THINK IT’S EVER APPROPRIATE FOR THE PRESIDENT TO APPROPRIATE FOR THE PRESIDENT TO USE HIS OFFICE TO SOLICIT USE HIS OFFICE TO SOLICIT INVESTIGATIONS INTO A DOMESTIC INVESTIGATIONS INTO A DOMESTIC POLITICAL OPPONENT? POLITICAL OPPONENT?>>SOLICITING INVESTIGATIONS>>SOLICITING INVESTIGATIONS INTO A DOMESTIC POLITICAL INTO A DOMESTIC POLITICAL OPPONENT, I DON’T THINK THAT OPPONENT, I DON’T THINK THAT WOULD BE IN ACCORD WITH OUR WOULD BE IN ACCORD WITH OUR VALUES. VALUES.>>YOU WERE AWARE THAT THERE>>YOU WERE AWARE THAT THERE WERE INDIVIDUALS AND FORCES WERE INDIVIDUALS AND FORCES OUTSIDE OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OUTSIDE OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT SEEKING TO SMEAR AMBASSADOR SEEKING TO SMEAR AMBASSADOR YOVANOVITCH, IS THAT CORRECT? YOVANOVITCH, IS THAT CORRECT?>>I WAS.>>I WAS.>>AND DID YOU KNOW MR. GIULIANI>>AND DID YOU KNOW MR. GIULIANI WAS ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE? WAS ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE?>>I BELIEVED HE WAS, YES.>>I BELIEVED HE WAS, YES.>>WERE YOU AWARE THAT RUDY>>WERE YOU AWARE THAT RUDY GIULIANI HAD OPENED A SECOND GIULIANI HAD OPENED A SECOND CHANNEL OF DIPLOMACY, IF YOU CHANNEL OF DIPLOMACY, IF YOU WANT TO CALL IT THAT, A SECOND WANT TO CALL IT THAT, A SECOND CHANNEL OF EFFORT IN UKRAINE? CHANNEL OF EFFORT IN UKRAINE?>>AS I SAID IN RESPONSE TO>>AS I SAID IN RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS FROM SENATOR MENENDEZ, QUESTIONS FROM SENATOR MENENDEZ, I WAS AWARE THAT MR. GIULIANI I WAS AWARE THAT MR. GIULIANI WAS INVOLVED IN UKRAINE ISSUES. WAS INVOLVED IN UKRAINE ISSUES.>>SO THAT’S ABOUT THE WAY THAT>>SO THAT’S ABOUT THE WAY THAT WENT. WENT. AND HERE FOR OUR LEAD-OFF AND HERE FOR OUR LEAD-OFF DISCUSSION ON A WEDNESDAY NIGHT, DISCUSSION ON A WEDNESDAY NIGHT, SHANNON PETTYPIECE, VETERAN SHANNON PETTYPIECE, VETERAN JOURNALIST AND SENIOR WHITE JOURNALIST AND SENIOR WHITE HOUSE REPORTER FOR NBC NEWS HOUSE REPORTER FOR NBC NEWS DIGITAL. DIGITAL. MIEKE EOYANG, ATTORNEY, FORMER MIEKE EOYANG, ATTORNEY, FORMER STAFFER FOR BOTH HOUSE INTEL AND STAFFER FOR BOTH HOUSE INTEL AND ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEES. ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEES. AND ANDREW DESIDERIO, AND ANDREW DESIDERIO, CONGRESSIONAL REPORTER FOR CONGRESSIONAL REPORTER FOR POLITICO. POLITICO. GOOD EVENING. GOOD EVENING. WELCOME TO YOU ALL. WELCOME TO YOU ALL. ANDREW, IETD LIKE TO BEGIN WITH ANDREW, IETD LIKE TO BEGIN WITH YOU AND YOUR BEAT, JUST TO YOU AND YOUR BEAT, JUST TO REMIND US, WHAT DOES BOLTON REMIND US, WHAT DOES BOLTON TESTIMONY GET YOU? TESTIMONY GET YOU? HOW BIG A FISH IS HE CONSIDERED HOW BIG A FISH IS HE CONSIDERED IN ALL OF THIS CONSIDERING HOW IN ALL OF THIS CONSIDERING HOW MUCH IS ALREADY IN THERE ON THE MUCH IS ALREADY IN THERE ON THE RECORD? RECORD?>>WELL, CONSIDERING WHAT WE>>WELL, CONSIDERING WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT WHAT HAS BEEN ALREADY KNOW ABOUT WHAT HAS BEEN TESTIFIED TO BEHIND CLOSED DOORS TESTIFIED TO BEHIND CLOSED DOORS IS THAT JOHN BOLTON WAS A IS THAT JOHN BOLTON WAS A WITNESS TO THESE EFFORTS, THESE WITNESS TO THESE EFFORTS, THESE SHADOW EFFORTS BY TRUMP-ALIGNED SHADOW EFFORTS BY TRUMP-ALIGNED ASSOCIATES AND CONSULTANTS TO ASSOCIATES AND CONSULTANTS TO TRY TO IMPLEMENT A SHADOW TRY TO IMPLEMENT A SHADOW FOREIGN POLICY THAT WAS FOREIGN POLICY THAT WAS INCONSISTENT WITH THE FOREIGN INCONSISTENT WITH THE FOREIGN POLICY THAT THE U.S. DIPLOMATIC POLICY THAT THE U.S. DIPLOMATIC AND NATIONAL SECURITY APPARATUS AND NATIONAL SECURITY APPARATUS WAS PUSHING. WAS PUSHING. OBVIOUSLY, JOHN BOLTON AS OBVIOUSLY, JOHN BOLTON AS SOMEONE WHO LED THE NATIONAL SOMEONE WHO LED THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL FOR SO LONG AND SECURITY COUNCIL FOR SO LONG AND HAS BEEN A RUSSIA HAWK FOR SO HAS BEEN A RUSSIA HAWK FOR SO LONG, WAS VERY INVESTED IN THE LONG, WAS VERY INVESTED IN THE IDEA OF SUPPORTING UKRAINE AND IDEA OF SUPPORTING UKRAINE AND MAKING SURE THEY HAD THE MAKING SURE THEY HAD THE RESOURCES TO PUSH BACK AGAINST RESOURCES TO PUSH BACK AGAINST RUSSIAN AGGRESSION. RUSSIAN AGGRESSION. AND WE’VE LEARNED FROM THE AND WE’VE LEARNED FROM THE TESTIMONY THAT, YOU KNOW, WHEN TESTIMONY THAT, YOU KNOW, WHEN HE LEARNED THAT RUDY GIULIANI HE LEARNED THAT RUDY GIULIANI WAS TRYING TO PUSH SOMETHING WAS TRYING TO PUSH SOMETHING THAT THE U.S. WAS TRYING TO WARN THAT THE U.S. WAS TRYING TO WARN AGAINST ESSENTIALLY HE WAS AGAINST ESSENTIALLY HE WAS BECOMING VERY ALARMED AT IT. BECOMING VERY ALARMED AT IT. WE HEARD FROM FIONA HILL, THE WE HEARD FROM FIONA HILL, THE PRESIDENT’S FORMER TOP RUSSIA PRESIDENT’S FORMER TOP RUSSIA AIDE, TO THAT EFFECT. AIDE, TO THAT EFFECT. WE HEARD OF COURSE FROM COLONEL WE HEARD OF COURSE FROM COLONEL VINDMAN YESTERDAY WHO BACKED UP VINDMAN YESTERDAY WHO BACKED UP A LOT OF FIONA HILL’S A LOT OF FIONA HILL’S ASSERTIONS. ASSERTIONS. AND THEN OF COURSE WILLIAM AND THEN OF COURSE WILLIAM TAYLOR LAST WEEK, THE TOP TAYLOR LAST WEEK, THE TOP DIPLOMAT TO UKRAINE. DIPLOMAT TO UKRAINE. SO IT SEEMS LIKE THE NEXUS HERE SO IT SEEMS LIKE THE NEXUS HERE ALWAYS COMES BACK TO JOHN BOLTON ALWAYS COMES BACK TO JOHN BOLTON IN THAT HE WAS AWARE OF THESE IN THAT HE WAS AWARE OF THESE EFFORTS AND NOT JUST AWARE BUT EFFORTS AND NOT JUST AWARE BUT HE WAS VERY CONCERNED AND HE WAS VERY CONCERNED AND ALARMED. ALARMED. AND THAT’S WHY I THINK HOUSE AND THAT’S WHY I THINK HOUSE DEMOCRATS REALLY WANT HIS DEMOCRATS REALLY WANT HIS TESTIMONY AT THIS POINT. TESTIMONY AT THIS POINT.>>SO MIEKE, YOU’RE THE LAWYER>>SO MIEKE, YOU’RE THE LAWYER IN THIS CONVERSATION. IN THIS CONVERSATION. WHEN A JOHN BOLTON SAYS I’M NOT WHEN A JOHN BOLTON SAYS I’M NOT GOING TO JUST RESPOND TO YOUR GOING TO JUST RESPOND TO YOUR INVITE BUT I WOULD ACCEPT A INVITE BUT I WOULD ACCEPT A SUBPOENA, DO YOU TAKE HIM AT HIS SUBPOENA, DO YOU TAKE HIM AT HIS WORD? WORD?>>I THINK YOU DO.>>I THINK YOU DO. AND WE’VE SEEN THIS HAPPEN WITH AND WE’VE SEEN THIS HAPPEN WITH OTHER WITNESSES COMING BEFORE OTHER WITNESSES COMING BEFORE THE COMMITTEES OF INQUIRY WHERE THE COMMITTEES OF INQUIRY WHERE THEY HAVE SAID HEY, I AM WILLING THEY HAVE SAID HEY, I AM WILLING TO COME BUT YOU’RE GOING TO HAVE TO COME BUT YOU’RE GOING TO HAVE TO FORCE ME TO COME, I CAN’T TO FORCE ME TO COME, I CAN’T COME VOLUNTARILY. COME VOLUNTARILY. IT’S INTERESTING BECAUSE MY IT’S INTERESTING BECAUSE MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT JOHN UNDERSTANDING IS THAT JOHN BOLTON SHARES AN ATTORNEY WITH BOLTON SHARES AN ATTORNEY WITH ANOTHER WITNESS THAT’S BEEN ANOTHER WITNESS THAT’S BEEN ASKED TO COME WHO HAS SAID, ASKED TO COME WHO HAS SAID, LOOK, I HAVE TO GO SEEK LEGAL LOOK, I HAVE TO GO SEEK LEGAL GUIDANCE BECAUSE I NEED TO FIND GUIDANCE BECAUSE I NEED TO FIND OUT WHETHER OR NOT THE OUT WHETHER OR NOT THE ADMINISTRATION’S ATTEMPTS TO BAR ADMINISTRATION’S ATTEMPTS TO BAR ME FROM APPEARING ARE LEGAL OR ME FROM APPEARING ARE LEGAL OR NOT. NOT. SO THEY’RE NOT DOING THE SO THEY’RE NOT DOING THE OUTRIGHT OBSTRUCTION THAT WE SAW OUTRIGHT OBSTRUCTION THAT WE SAW COMING OUT OF THE TRUMP WHITE COMING OUT OF THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE, BUT THEY ARE NOT COMING HOUSE, BUT THEY ARE NOT COMING FULLY VOLUNTARILY THE WAY WE FULLY VOLUNTARILY THE WAY WE HAVE SEEN AMBASSADOR TAYLOR AND HAVE SEEN AMBASSADOR TAYLOR AND OTHERS COME. OTHERS COME.>>SO SHANNON, I WANT TO READ>>SO SHANNON, I WANT TO READ YOU A PIECE OF REPORTING FROM YOU A PIECE OF REPORTING FROM THE ASSOCIATED PRESS JUST TO THE ASSOCIATED PRESS JUST TO REMIND US ABOUT THE REMIND US ABOUT THE CIRCUMSTANCES WHEN BOLTON LEFT. CIRCUMSTANCES WHEN BOLTON LEFT. MORRISON, THIS GENTLEMAN WHO’S MORRISON, THIS GENTLEMAN WHO’S TESTIFYING TOMORROW, TOLD PEOPLE TESTIFYING TOMORROW, TOLD PEOPLE AFTER BOLTON WAS FORCED OUT OF AFTER BOLTON WAS FORCED OUT OF HIS JOB, THAT THE NATIONAL HIS JOB, THAT THE NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER HAD TRIED TO SECURITY ADVISER HAD TRIED TO STOP GIULIANI’S DIPLOMATIC STOP GIULIANI’S DIPLOMATIC DEALINGS WITH UKRAINE AND THAT DEALINGS WITH UKRAINE AND THAT MORRISON AGREED. MORRISON AGREED. AND SHANNON, IT’S JUST MORE AND SHANNON, IT’S JUST MORE EVIDENCE THAT EVERY DAY THERE’S EVIDENCE THAT EVERY DAY THERE’S JUST MORE EVIDENCE, AND IT’S JUST MORE EVIDENCE, AND IT’S THESE PEOPLE FROM THE INSIDE. THESE PEOPLE FROM THE INSIDE. THIS WILL NOW MAKE TWO PEOPLE THIS WILL NOW MAKE TWO PEOPLE WHO HEARD THE CALL HAPPENING WHO HEARD THE CALL HAPPENING CONTEMPORANEOUSLY. CONTEMPORANEOUSLY.>>AND THAT UNDERCUTS THIS>>AND THAT UNDERCUTS THIS ARGUMENT THAT REPUBLICANS HAVE ARGUMENT THAT REPUBLICANS HAVE BEEN TRYING TO MAKE OF FIRST WE BEEN TRYING TO MAKE OF FIRST WE DON’T HAVE ANYONE WITH DIRECT DON’T HAVE ANYONE WITH DIRECT FIRSTHAND KNOWLEDGE OF THE CALL. FIRSTHAND KNOWLEDGE OF THE CALL. WELL, WE NOW DO HAVE SOMEONE WELL, WE NOW DO HAVE SOMEONE WITH DIRECT FIRSTHAND KNOWLEDGE WITH DIRECT FIRSTHAND KNOWLEDGE OF THE CALL. OF THE CALL. THEY HAVE TRIED TO SAY, WELL, THEY HAVE TRIED TO SAY, WELL, BILL TAYLOR AND HIS ASSERTION BILL TAYLOR AND HIS ASSERTION THERE WAS A QUID PRO QUO, THAT’S THERE WAS A QUID PRO QUO, THAT’S JUST ONE PERSON, WE DON’T HAVE JUST ONE PERSON, WE DON’T HAVE ANYONE BACKING THAT UP. ANYONE BACKING THAT UP. WELL, THEY NOW DO HAVE SOMEONE WELL, THEY NOW DO HAVE SOMEONE BACKING THAT UP BECAUSE THAT IS BACKING THAT UP BECAUSE THAT IS ESSENTIALLY WHAT VINDMAN SAID ESSENTIALLY WHAT VINDMAN SAID YESTERDAY, IS THAT THE AIDE TO YESTERDAY, IS THAT THE AIDE TO UKRAINE, THE MEETING WITH THE UKRAINE, THE MEETING WITH THE WHITE HOUSE, WAS CONTINGENT AS WHITE HOUSE, WAS CONTINGENT AS HE SAID ON THESE INVESTIGATIONS HE SAID ON THESE INVESTIGATIONS GOING THROUGH. GOING THROUGH. SO WHILE THESE WITNESSES IN THE SO WHILE THESE WITNESSES IN THE NEXT FEW DAYS AND THAT WE SAW NEXT FEW DAYS AND THAT WE SAW TODAY MAY NOT BRING ANY SORT OF TODAY MAY NOT BRING ANY SORT OF NEW REVELATIONS, THEY ARE NEW REVELATIONS, THEY ARE BACKING UP THE CURRENT BACKING UP THE CURRENT REVELATIONS THAT WE HAVE. REVELATIONS THAT WE HAVE. AND I WOULD NOTE THE WHITE HOUSE AND I WOULD NOTE THE WHITE HOUSE IS REALLY IN THE DARK HERE. IS REALLY IN THE DARK HERE. THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT ANYONE IS THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT ANYONE IS GOING TO SAY. GOING TO SAY. THEY DON’T REALLY KNOW WHAT JOHN THEY DON’T REALLY KNOW WHAT JOHN BOLTON IS GOING TO SAY. BOLTON IS GOING TO SAY. AND PART OF THAT IS BECAUSE AND PART OF THAT IS BECAUSE THEY’RE REFUSING TO COOPERATE THEY’RE REFUSING TO COOPERATE WITH THIS INVESTIGATION. WITH THIS INVESTIGATION. THE WHITE HOUSE DOESN’T EVEN THE WHITE HOUSE DOESN’T EVEN KNOW WHAT EXACTLY IS SAID IN KNOW WHAT EXACTLY IS SAID IN THESE HEARING ROOMS. THESE HEARING ROOMS. AND AS A CONTRAST TO THE MUELLER AND AS A CONTRAST TO THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION, WHERE THE WHITE INVESTIGATION, WHERE THE WHITE HOUSE WAS COOPERATING, WHERE HOUSE WAS COOPERATING, WHERE EVERY WITNESS FROM THE WHITE EVERY WITNESS FROM THE WHITE HOUSE WHO WENT IN TO TALK TO HOUSE WHO WENT IN TO TALK TO MUELLER WENT IN AND TALKED TO MUELLER WENT IN AND TALKED TO THE WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL’S THE WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL’S OFFICE, THE LAWYERS BETWEEN OFFICE, THE LAWYERS BETWEEN THOSE WITNESSES AND THE WHITE THOSE WITNESSES AND THE WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL’S OFFICE WERE HOUSE COUNSEL’S OFFICE WERE COORDINATING, WERE DISCUSSING. COORDINATING, WERE DISCUSSING. THEY HAD A CLEAR PICTURE OF WHAT THEY HAD A CLEAR PICTURE OF WHAT WAS GOING ON. WAS GOING ON. BECAUSE THE WHITE HOUSE IS NOT BECAUSE THE WHITE HOUSE IS NOT COOPERATING IN THIS, THEY DO NOT COOPERATING IN THIS, THEY DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER IN THE HEARING HAVE A LAWYER IN THE HEARING ROOM AND THE WHITE HOUSE LAWYERS ROOM AND THE WHITE HOUSE LAWYERS CANNOT EXCHANGE ANY INFORMATION CANNOT EXCHANGE ANY INFORMATION AT ALL WITH THE WITNESSES WHO AT ALL WITH THE WITNESSES WHO ARE GOING FORWARD. ARE GOING FORWARD.>>SHANNON, WHAT AN EXCELLENT>>SHANNON, WHAT AN EXCELLENT POINT. POINT. AND GOING INTO ANOTHER DAY AND GOING INTO ANOTHER DAY TOMORROW, THEY AGAIN DON’T KNOW TOMORROW, THEY AGAIN DON’T KNOW EXACTLY WHAT IT IS WE’LL BE EXACTLY WHAT IT IS WE’LL BE REPORTING ON 24 HOURS FROM NOW. REPORTING ON 24 HOURS FROM NOW. HEY, ANDREW, SINCE WE’VE BEEN ON HEY, ANDREW, SINCE WE’VE BEEN ON THE AIR THREE OTHER GUESTS ON THE AIR THREE OTHER GUESTS ON THIS BROADCAST, CAROL LEN IG, THIS BROADCAST, CAROL LEN IG, DON HAMBURGER, AND GREG MILLER DON HAMBURGER, AND GREG MILLER OVER AT THE “WASHINGTON POST” OVER AT THE “WASHINGTON POST” HAVE BROKEN THIS. HAVE BROKEN THIS. HERE’S THE HEADLINE. HERE’S THE HEADLINE. “WHITE HOUSE LAWYER MOVED “WHITE HOUSE LAWYER MOVED TRANSCRIPT OF TRUMP CALL TO TRANSCRIPT OF TRUMP CALL TO CLASSIFIED SERVER.” CLASSIFIED SERVER.” WHERE HAVE WE HEARD THAT WHERE HAVE WE HEARD THAT EXPRESSION BEFORE? EXPRESSION BEFORE? “AFTER UKRAINE ADVISER RAISED “AFTER UKRAINE ADVISER RAISED ALARMS.” ALARMS.” SO WE ALL KNOW THE BROAD SO WE ALL KNOW THE BROAD OUTLINES OF THIS STORY. OUTLINES OF THIS STORY. LIEUTENANT COLONEL VINDMAN LIEUTENANT COLONEL VINDMAN TESTIFIED YESTERDAY HE HEARS THE TESTIFIED YESTERDAY HE HEARS THE PRESIDENT ON THE PHONE WITH THE PRESIDENT ON THE PHONE WITH THE PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE. PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE. AND IN PLACES LATER REPLACED BUT AND IN PLACES LATER REPLACED BUT ELLIPSES ELLIPSES ELLIPSES, THREE DOTS, HE HEARS ELLIPSES, THREE DOTS, HE HEARS THE PRESIDENT TALKING ABOUT THE PRESIDENT TALKING ABOUT THINGS THAT WEREN’T REFLECTED ON THINGS THAT WEREN’T REFLECTED ON THE TRANSCRIPT, OR THE SUMMARY THE TRANSCRIPT, OR THE SUMMARY THAT WE SAW. THAT WE SAW. THIS NOW ALLEGES THAT THE LAWYER THIS NOW ALLEGES THAT THE LAWYER AT THE NSC IS THE ONE WHO MADE AT THE NSC IS THE ONE WHO MADE THE CALL TO PUT IT IN A MORE THE CALL TO PUT IT IN A MORE SECURE PLACE. SECURE PLACE. DOES THIS BY YOUR READING, DOES THIS BY YOUR READING, ANDREW, IMPLY ANY GUILT OR ANDREW, IMPLY ANY GUILT OR INNOCENCE OR ANY CONCLUSION? INNOCENCE OR ANY CONCLUSION?>>WELL, MY FIRST THOUGHT IS>>WELL, MY FIRST THOUGHT IS THAT IT CORROBORATES THE THAT IT CORROBORATES THE WHISTLE-BLOWER’S COMPLAINT EVEN WHISTLE-BLOWER’S COMPLAINT EVEN FURTHER. FURTHER. YOU’LL RECALL THAT THE THIRD YOU’LL RECALL THAT THE THIRD MOST CENTRAL POINT THAT THE MOST CENTRAL POINT THAT THE WHISTLE-BLOWER COMPLAINT WAS WHISTLE-BLOWER COMPLAINT WAS MAKING WAS THAT THERE WAS AN MAKING WAS THAT THERE WAS AN EFFORT TO SHIELD THE CONTENTS OF EFFORT TO SHIELD THE CONTENTS OF THE PRESIDENT’S CONVERSATION THE PRESIDENT’S CONVERSATION WITH PRESIDENT ZELENSKY BY WITH PRESIDENT ZELENSKY BY PUTTING IT ONTO A CLASSIFIED PUTTING IT ONTO A CLASSIFIED SERVER, THAT USUALLY THOSE SERVER, THAT USUALLY THOSE TRANSCRIPTS DO NOT GO ON. TRANSCRIPTS DO NOT GO ON. AND YESTERDAY OF COURSE WE AND YESTERDAY OF COURSE WE LEARNED LATE LAST NIGHT, RATHER, LEARNED LATE LAST NIGHT, RATHER, AFTER VINDMAN TESTIFIED FOR MORE AFTER VINDMAN TESTIFIED FOR MORE THAN TEN HOURS BEHIND CLOSED THAN TEN HOURS BEHIND CLOSED DOORS THAT HE WAS TRYING TO SORT DOORS THAT HE WAS TRYING TO SORT OF GET A MORE CORRECT VERSION OF OF GET A MORE CORRECT VERSION OF THE TRANSCRIPT OUT THERE IN THE TRANSCRIPT OUT THERE IN TERMS OF THE ONE THAT WAS TERMS OF THE ONE THAT WAS RELEASED PUBLICLY INCLUDING RELEASED PUBLICLY INCLUDING ADDING REFERENCES TO BURISMA, OF ADDING REFERENCES TO BURISMA, OF COURSE THE UKRAINIAN ENERGY COURSE THE UKRAINIAN ENERGY COMPANY WHERE HUNTER BIDEN COMPANY WHERE HUNTER BIDEN SERVED ON THE BOARD OF. SERVED ON THE BOARD OF. AND HE WAS TRYING TO ESSENTIALLY AND HE WAS TRYING TO ESSENTIALLY MAKE IT MORE ACCURATE SO THAT MAKE IT MORE ACCURATE SO THAT THE PUBLIC COULD GET AN ACCURATE THE PUBLIC COULD GET AN ACCURATE READING OF IT. READING OF IT. BUT HE WAS ESSENTIALLY — HE WAS BUT HE WAS ESSENTIALLY — HE WAS VOTED DOWN IN THAT RESPECT. VOTED DOWN IN THAT RESPECT. AND IT ALL COMES BACK TO THAT AND IT ALL COMES BACK TO THAT WHISTLE-BLOWER COMPLAINT, WHISTLE-BLOWER COMPLAINT, THOUGH, AND THE EXTENT TO WHICH THOUGH, AND THE EXTENT TO WHICH IT’S BEING CORROBORATED BEHIND IT’S BEING CORROBORATED BEHIND CLOSED DOORS. CLOSED DOORS. AND THAT’S MY FIRST THOUGHT AND THAT’S MY FIRST THOUGHT HEARING THIS “WASHINGTON POST” HEARING THIS “WASHINGTON POST” STORY TONIGHT. STORY TONIGHT.>>SO MIEKE, BY DISTANT OF YOUR>>SO MIEKE, BY DISTANT OF YOUR EXPERIENCE ON THE HOUSE OF EXPERIENCE ON THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, YOU KNOW THAT REPRESENTATIVES, YOU KNOW THAT IN NORMAL TIMES IF IT’S A FOOT IN NORMAL TIMES IF IT’S A FOOT RACE BETWEEN MOLASSES AND THE RACE BETWEEN MOLASSES AND THE HOUSE CALENDAR MOLASSES WINS HOUSE CALENDAR MOLASSES WINS WALKING AWAY. WALKING AWAY. HOWEVER, ALL OF THIS HAS BEEN HOWEVER, ALL OF THIS HAS BEEN FAST TRACKED. FAST TRACKED. HAVING SAID THAT, DO YOU HAVE HAVING SAID THAT, DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA, JUST A VIEWER’S GUIDE, ANY IDEA, JUST A VIEWER’S GUIDE, AS TO TIMING? AS TO TIMING? START WITH WHEN WE’LL SEE THE START WITH WHEN WE’LL SEE THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARINGS PERHAPS. FIRST PUBLIC HEARINGS PERHAPS.>>SO IT’S NOT CLEAR WHEN WE’LL>>SO IT’S NOT CLEAR WHEN WE’LL SEE THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARINGS. SEE THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARINGS. BUT NOW THAT THEY HAVE THIS BUT NOW THAT THEY HAVE THIS RESOLUTION THAT WILL COME RESOLUTION THAT WILL COME FORWARD WHICH WILL ALLOW CHIRM FORWARD WHICH WILL ALLOW CHIRM SCHIFF TO SET PUBLIC HEARINGS, SCHIFF TO SET PUBLIC HEARINGS, WE NOW HAVE A PROCESS GOING WE NOW HAVE A PROCESS GOING FORWARD THAT WILL BE MORE FORWARD THAT WILL BE MORE TRANSPARENT SO THE AMERICAN TRANSPARENT SO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE CAN SEE WHAT THESE PEOPLE CAN SEE WHAT THESE WITNESSES HAVE SAID BEHIND WITNESSES HAVE SAID BEHIND CLOSED DOORS. CLOSED DOORS. CHAIRMAN SCHIFF HAD SAID EARLIER CHAIRMAN SCHIFF HAD SAID EARLIER THAT HE WOULD MAKE STATEMENTS THAT HE WOULD MAKE STATEMENTS AND WITNESS EVIDENCE PUBLIC ONCE AND WITNESS EVIDENCE PUBLIC ONCE IT NO LONGER COMPROMISED THE IT NO LONGER COMPROMISED THE INQUIRY ITSELF AND AS SHANNON INQUIRY ITSELF AND AS SHANNON POINTED OUT SINCE THE WHITE POINTED OUT SINCE THE WHITE HOUSE DOESN’T KNOW WHAT’S HOUSE DOESN’T KNOW WHAT’S HAPPENING THEY CAN’T PUT HAPPENING THEY CAN’T PUT PRESSURE ON WITNESSES TO TRY AND PRESSURE ON WITNESSES TO TRY AND CONFORM TO A PARTICULAR STORY. CONFORM TO A PARTICULAR STORY. THEY GO IN AND WHAT THEY SAY IS THEY GO IN AND WHAT THEY SAY IS BLACK BOXED SO THEY CAN THEN BLACK BOXED SO THEY CAN THEN CHECK IT AGAINST OTHER CHECK IT AGAINST OTHER WITNESSES. WITNESSES. WE’LL SEE ALL THAT COME OUT. WE’LL SEE ALL THAT COME OUT. BUT AGAIN, THE HOUSE HAS MADE BUT AGAIN, THE HOUSE HAS MADE VERY CLEAR THEY WANT THIS DONE VERY CLEAR THEY WANT THIS DONE BEFORE THE END OF THE YEAR. BEFORE THE END OF THE YEAR. AND NOTHING MOTIVATES MEMBERS OF AND NOTHING MOTIVATES MEMBERS OF CONGRESS TO GET SOMETHING DONE CONGRESS TO GET SOMETHING DONE THAN LEAVING FOR THE HOLIDAYS. THAN LEAVING FOR THE HOLIDAYS.>>ABSOLUTELY.>>ABSOLUTELY. DON’T GET BETWEEN THEM AND DON’T GET BETWEEN THEM AND NATIONAL AIRPORT. NATIONAL AIRPORT. IT WILL BE AT YOUR PERIL. IT WILL BE AT YOUR PERIL. SHANNON, A POINT YOU STARTED TO SHANNON, A POINT YOU STARTED TO MAKE, AND I WANT TO FINISH ON MAKE, AND I WANT TO FINISH ON IT. IT. AND THAT IS THE ART OF AND THAT IS THE ART OF DISTRACTION. DISTRACTION. THE SHINY OBJECT. THE SHINY OBJECT. ALL OF THE ARGUMENTS WE’VE BEEN ALL OF THE ARGUMENTS WE’VE BEEN SEEING. SEEING. SECRET COURT PROCESS. SECRET COURT PROCESS. KANGAROO COURT. KANGAROO COURT. THERE HAVE BEEN REPUBLICANS IN THERE HAVE BEEN REPUBLICANS IN THESE DEPOSITIONS ALL THE WHILE. THESE DEPOSITIONS ALL THE WHILE. AREN’T THE REPUBLICANS ABOUT TO AREN’T THE REPUBLICANS ABOUT TO LOSE ALL THOSE TALKING POINTS LOSE ALL THOSE TALKING POINTS WHEN ALL OF THIS GETS TELEVISED WHEN ALL OF THIS GETS TELEVISED ON THIS NETWORK AND OTHERS? ON THIS NETWORK AND OTHERS? AND MORE THAN THAT, WE GET TO AND MORE THAN THAT, WE GET TO READ ALL THESE DEPOSITIONS WITH READ ALL THESE DEPOSITIONS WITH SECRETS REDACTED FOR NATIONAL SECRETS REDACTED FOR NATIONAL SECURITY. SECURITY.>>WELL, YES.>>WELL, YES. THERE IS THIS ASSUMPTION THAT THERE IS THIS ASSUMPTION THAT TRANSPARENCY WILL WORK IN THE TRANSPARENCY WILL WORK IN THE REPUBLICANS’ FAVOR, THAT THEY REPUBLICANS’ FAVOR, THAT THEY WILL GET A CHANCE TO PRESENT A WILL GET A CHANCE TO PRESENT A COUNTERNARRATIVE OR CHIP AWAY AT COUNTERNARRATIVE OR CHIP AWAY AT THESE WITNESSES. THESE WITNESSES. THEY KIND OF THINK BACK TO THE THEY KIND OF THINK BACK TO THE BLASEY FORD TESTIMONY WHERE THEY BLASEY FORD TESTIMONY WHERE THEY FEEL THEY WERE ABLE TO TURN THE FEEL THEY WERE ABLE TO TURN THE TABLES ON THE FAVORITIVE AGAINST TABLES ON THE FAVORITIVE AGAINST KAVANAUGH ONCE HER TESTIMONY WAS KAVANAUGH ONCE HER TESTIMONY WAS PUBLIC AND REPUBLICANS WERE ABLE PUBLIC AND REPUBLICANS WERE ABLE TO SORT OF DIG IN AND GO AFTER TO SORT OF DIG IN AND GO AFTER HER CHARACTER. HER CHARACTER. BUT THAT IS ASSUMING THAT THE BUT THAT IS ASSUMING THAT THE FACTS AREN’T ON YOUR SIDE — FACTS AREN’T ON YOUR SIDE — ASSUMING THE FACTS WON’T BE ON ASSUMING THE FACTS WON’T BE ON YOUR SIDE. YOUR SIDE. AND TRANSPARENCY COULD REALLY AND TRANSPARENCY COULD REALLY COME AND GET THEM. COME AND GET THEM. THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT THESE THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT THESE WITNESSES ARE GOING TO SAY. WITNESSES ARE GOING TO SAY. THEY HAVE AN IDEA NOW THAT THEY HAVE AN IDEA NOW THAT THEY’VE HAD SOME OF THESE THEY’VE HAD SOME OF THESE CLOSED-DOOR HEARINGS TO GIVE CLOSED-DOOR HEARINGS TO GIVE THEM AN IDEA OF WHERE THIS IS THEM AN IDEA OF WHERE THIS IS GOING, BUT THEY MIGHT NOT GOING, BUT THEY MIGHT NOT NECESSARILY WANT A TELEVISION NECESSARILY WANT A TELEVISION CLIP OF SOME OF THE THINGS THAT CLIP OF SOME OF THE THINGS THAT ARE GOING TO BE SAID IN THESE ARE GOING TO BE SAID IN THESE HEARINGS COMING OUT FORWARD. HEARINGS COMING OUT FORWARD. BUT THAT SAID, I THINK THEY BUT THAT SAID, I THINK THEY WILL — IF THE TALKING POINTS WILL — IF THE TALKING POINTS HAVE TO MOVE FROM PROCESS TO HAVE TO MOVE FROM PROCESS TO SOMETHING ELSE THEY WILL SHIFT SOMETHING ELSE THEY WILL SHIFT THOSE. THOSE. AND THE PRESIDENT IS STAYING ON AND THE PRESIDENT IS STAYING ON A MESSAGE. A MESSAGE. LIKE WE SAW WITH THE MUELLER LIKE WE SAW WITH THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION OF NO QUID PRO INVESTIGATION OF NO QUID PRO QUO. QUO. WHETHER IT IS TRUE ORRIN, WHETHER IT IS TRUE ORRIN, WHETHER IT IS CONTRADICTED, HE WHETHER IT IS CONTRADICTED, HE WILL STICK TO THAT. WILL STICK TO THAT. IT IS THE NEW NO COLLUSION. IT IS THE NEW NO COLLUSION. HE WILL REPEAT IT OVER AND OVER HE WILL REPEAT IT OVER AND OVER AGAIN ALONG WITH THIS IS A WITCH AGAIN ALONG WITH THIS IS A WITCH HUNT AND HOPE IT GETS IMPRINTED HUNT AND HOPE IT GETS IMPRINTED IN THE AMERICAN PUBLIC’S PSYCHE IN THE AMERICAN PUBLIC’S PSYCHE SIMILAR TO HOW HE FELT IT DID IN SIMILAR TO HOW HE FELT IT DID IN THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION. THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION. SO I THINK DEVELOPMENTS ASIDE, SO I THINK DEVELOPMENTS ASIDE, THAT’S WHERE THE PRESIDENT IS THAT’S WHERE THE PRESIDENT IS GOING AND THEY WILL STICK TO A GOING AND THEY WILL STICK TO A MESSAGE, THEY WILL DENY, THEY MESSAGE, THEY WILL DENY, THEY WILL ATTEMPT TO DISCREDIT, JUST WILL ATTEMPT TO DISCREDIT, JUST AS WE SAW THEM DO DURING THE AS WE SAW THEM DO DURING THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION. MUELLER INVESTIGATION.>>A GREAT POINT TO END ON.>>A GREAT POINT TO END ON. AND THANK YOU FOR THAT. AND THANK YOU FOR THAT. THREE OF OUR RETURNING VETERANS,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *