Green Tyranny: Exposing the Totalitarian Roots of the Climate Industrial Complex

Green Tyranny: Exposing the Totalitarian Roots of the Climate Industrial Complex

good afternoon welcome to the Heritage Foundation in our Lewis Lehrman auditorium we of course welcome those who join us on our heritage dot org website on all of these occasions for our guests here in house we would ask that last courtesy to check that our mobile devices have been silenced or turned off and of course for those watching online you're welcome to send questions or comments at any time simply emailing speaker at heritage org hosting our guest today is Becky Norton Dunlop who serves as the Ronald Reagan distinguished fellow here at Heritage as a conservative movement leader she serves as chairman of the conservative Action project she also advocates for Heritage's American conservation ethic and in Vance's energy and natural resources policy in general she previously served as Heritage's vice president for external relations and most recently led our restore America project before joining heritage in 1998 she served as Secretary of Natural Resources for the Commonwealth of Virginia in the cabinet of then Governor George Allen she's also served significant roles in the Reagan administration as deputy assistant to the president for presidential personnel special assistant to the president and director of his cabinet office as well as senior special assistant to attorney general ed Meese and at interior she was deputy undersecretary of the department as well as an assistant secretary for Fish Wildlife and Parks please join me in welcoming my colleague and friend Becky Norton Donna thank you John and let me add my words of welcome to you we love having people come to the Heritage Foundation either personally or online or on television so welcome welcome welcome well you know the Heritage Foundation has promoted the American conservation ethic we call land of Liberty stewardship of America's environment and the number-one principle that we outline is people are our most important unique and precious resource and our number eight principle is that the most successful environmental policies flow liberté people and liberty so when I read the opening sentence of chapter 1 of the book that I got from encounter books I read this sentence this book is about freedom and I was hooked I knew I had to read the rest of this book well the author of this book is with us today and he has got actually a final copy of his book green tyranny and the author is Rupert dar wall he's been in business finance he's been an investment banker he's been in the public policy arena he's been in government he's seen this issue from a lot of various angles and he studied at Cambridge where he studied economics and history a great foundation for writing this very very fine book let me just tell you what a couple of our noted friends have said about his new book Green tyranny michael barone he's a friend to all of us here at Heritage and well-known across our country said Rupert Darr wall has written a definitive and clear-eyed history of global warming alarmism its success at enlisting Western elites in its cause Wow very very very important Clarke judge said Rupert der Waal has told a story of frauds and fools thoroughly and well his truth may be inconvenient to some and finally let me say that Charles Moore from The Daily Telegraph wrote Rupert dar Wall is a wonderfully Lou a historian of intellectual and political movements which is just a job to explain what has been inflicted on us over the past 30 years or so in the name of saving the planet many very fine people who've read this book are recommending it to all of us and we are very fortunate here at the Heritage Foundation to have the author to come and talk to us a little bit about his book what prompted him to write it and take your questions so welcome to the Heritage Foundation Rupert our wall Thank You Becky for those your very kind words I was in Washington almost exactly a year ago and it's extraordinary how much has changed since then nowhere has the change being more profound more consequential and more necessary than in climate and energy policy the United States is going to withdraw from the Paris agreement the climate treaty in orbit name that President Obama didn't have the guts to send to the Senate for its advice in consent no one should underestimate the historic importance of President Trump's decision this is the third time no less that a Republican president has rejected targets and timetables for emissions cuts the first Bush President Bush in the original UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the second Bush wishes repudiation of the Kyoto Protocol the president Trump's decision I think is the most important it is devastating for the UN climate process the whole architecture of the Paris agreement have been designed to subvert the requirement to obtain the Senate's advice and consent withdraw freeze America to be the world's hydrocarbon superpower it enables EPA Administrator Scott Pruett to roll back the clean power plan all this is happening because of what happened on November the 8th 2016 and it wouldn't have happened but for the tremendous work undertaken by conservative and libertarian think tanks in this city and across the country notably in Chicago and in Austin Texas they took on the climate industrial complex they prepared the intellectual ground and show showed why it needed to be done and what needed to be done America roads a huge debt of gratitude to the scholars and thinkers at Heritage who have been at the forefront of this great effort as do I so I'd like to take the opportunity to record my thanks the experts at Heritage who helped me in various ways with green terney Nick loris and David Kreutzer Stephen Moore together with his co-author of fueling freedom Kathleen Hartnett white president Trump's nominee to lead the the Council on Environmental Quality and Steven Graves now working in the one building in Washington that's more powerful than this one because this is something bigger than energy policy it's bigger than economics than the mining jobs and the new jobs being created by the oil and gas sector from the shale revolution and bigger than all the manufacturing jobs being reassured thanks to America's energy super abundance this is about something more fundamental ultimately this is a battle between the administrative state and America's constitutional order it's about how America is governed in a word it's about freedom a return to this towards the end of my remarks but first I'd like to tell you how he got here and why the age of global warming turned out to be the age of wind and solar global warming wasn't meant to be like this the original idea was that nuclear power was going to be the solution politics of global warming actually began in Sweden much earlier than most people suppose politicians over here first started talking about global warming in the late 1980s as I'm sure you all know it was in June 1988 that NASA scientists and climate alarmist James Hansen gave his testimony to the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee yet Sweden had already been obsessing about global warming for a decade and a half in 1974 when Al Gore was still at law school the Swedish Prime Minister Olaf Palmer was saying that climate change would be the big issue the end of the 20th century Sweden the country the progressive left wants America to be its welfare state the social engineering a foreign policy based on moral preening the longest period of one-party rule in any Western democracy a social democratic party claiming direct lineal descent through marks and angles a pert a party Bernie Sanders wants the Democrats here to be there's a lot of Sweden in green tyranny for good reason in 1971 Rowland Huntford the London observer Scandinavian correspondent wrote a book on Sweden called the new totalitarians Huntford argued that the Swedish Democrats were pioneering a new form of soft totalitarianism nearly two centuries before Napoleon Sweden had developed a centralized administrative apparatus when the Social Democrats formed their first government in 1921 it gave them a political system Huntford says adapted to the swift enactment of the intentions of the central bureaucracy the legislature is weak the executive strong and for centuries real power has laid in the government administrative machine does that sound at all familiar sounds to me like very much like what Barack Obama's administered state wanted to become the organs of the Swedish state became the perfect instruments to carry out the 20th century's most prolonged and thorough experiment in social engineering outside the Soviet Union and Communist China it pioneered a cradle to grave welfare state to abolish to replace the family and abolish the patriarchy it operated a eugenics program championed by Swedish economists and scientists alike a student protests swept the way west in the late 1960s in the 1970s it used anti Americanism as a safety valve and aligned Sweden with the Vietcong the Khmer Rouge and Fidel Castro Sweden as everyone knows had a policy of neutrality since the Napoleonic Wars yet how many know that throughout the Cold War Sweden actually had a secret military alliance with Washington or that Olaf promised first job after returning to Sweden from his studies at Kenyon College Ohio was in the Pro CIA wing of the Swedish intelligence service Sweden is not what it appears so when in the late 1960s Sweden launched a war on coal first with the acid rain scare and then with global warming what was it up to it would I think be naive to take this at face value and think that Olaf Palmer was motivated by genuine concern about anthropogenic global warming deep deception came easily to this immensely talented and sophisticated politician in the newspaper interview where he first talked about global warming Palmer explained that a vision of utopia has the same function as a mirage in the desert without the Mirage you wouldn't get to the next day basis global warming perhaps as a political Mirage and what was the Oasis he was heading to Sweden Social Democrats were about to embark on the world's largest civil nuclear power program in terms of gigawatts per capita but nuclear power wasn't at all popular with many normal ordinary Swedish voters so the Social Democrats decided they had to frighten Swede by claiming the alternative need to nuclear was far worse Sweden does not have any coal of its own so they played the cold card by hyping up acid rain if you don't have nuclear Sweden's forests will die and its lakes will fill up with sulfuric acid after acid rain came global warming significantly Palmas friend the scientist Bert Berlin played a leading role in both he wrote the first government report anywhere in the world on acid rain his report has a familiar ring replaced the words acid rain with climate change and it reads like the prototype of an IP IPCC assessment report indeed more than any single individual Berlin can claim credit for the creation of the unity government Intergovernmental Panel on panel on climate change and Sweden more than any other country brought the IPCC into being as you'll find in the pages of my book global warming was politicized right from the start and make no mistake global warming was first deployed for political reasons yes Sweden succeeded putting acid rain and then global warming onto the International agenda but it completely failed when it came to nuclear power give him that Sweden started the global warming scare to get nuclear power how did we end up with wind and solar in my first book I just I touched on the growth of environmentalism during the darkest chapter of Europe's history it happens to be a historical fact that the Nazis were the first political party in the world to champion whimper which they did in the 1933 Reichstag elections just weeks after invading the Soviet Union Hitler was telling his dinner companions that wind path was the future I suppose you might say in that regard he got something right but for the third for the three decades after the Second World War West Germany was a model Western democracy as one eco socialists complained the german social democrats had replaced the class struggle with the american way of life but that began to change in the 1970s no other country had such a high proportion of far-left students as West Germany a survey in 1969 found that 30 percent of West German high school and university students claimed to sympathize with Marxism or communism in the 1950s the Frankfurt School of Marxist intellectuals had returned from the United States to Frankfurt there were student protests particularly against the Vietnam War in June 1967 a student demonstrator was shot and killed in West Berlin it was the shot that put conservative West Germany on course to evolve into the progressive country it is today the New York Times declared four decades later in fact the West Berlin policeman who fired that shot was a Stasi agent an agent of the East German communist state in the 1970s radicalization of students turned into terrorism culminating in the German autumn of 1977 when a plane was hijacked the head of the West German Employees Association was kidnapped and killed and the imprisoned ringleaders of the baader-meinhof gang committed suicide ordinary Germans were appalled at the violence the extreme left itself washed up on the margins of West German society but they soon found a way back like the Swedish Social Democrats the German SPD he wanted to build a string of nuclear power stations but the nuclear program awakened something deep in the German soul that had lain dormant since the Nazi period they're huge spontaneous demonstrations against nuclear power the washed-up student radicals notably yashka Fischer and Danny Cohen Bend and it saw their chance the green Green Party was formed in 1980 the new left the student radicals by then aging middle-aged radicals taking the leadership of the new party and absorbing the old ecological guard of the of ex-nazis neo-nazis now the far-right nationalist to do this the aging student radicals the new left didn't have to perform a somersault they just changed color they took the left-wing concepts of the past and dressed them up in the ecological garb we see today instead of Marxism is catastrophic vision of capitalism and eco catastrophe instead of the socialist utopia a new ecological one instead of the cult of the factory the cult of the forest instead of the color red the color green I wish I'd written that in fact it was written by Paul Berman the liberal New York intellectual in a brilliant essay first published in the new New York in The New Republic in 2001 Berman writes of the German student radicals the 1968 has being made and being motivated by anti Nazism looking for Nazis hiding under every bed and in their every cupboard becoming so twisted they ended up seeing the State of Israel as a crypto Nazi state as Berman summarizes the situation quote to have set out to fight Nazism in its sundry modern democratic guises only to have ended up in a modern left-wing guys Nazi like green tyranny takes Berman's analysis one step further not only did the New Left share the irrationality and the nihilism of the Nazis they ended up embracing the Nazis green ideology red and green makes brown and here we come to an unpleasant truth and one that can't be sugar-coated the people who were on the wrong side of the cold war came out on top in the post Cold War era the greens helped turn the Kremlin backed peace movement into a mass movement to prevent to try to prevent the Atlantic Alliance from countering the threat posed by Soviet ss-20 nuclear missiles as Frances president Metron put it pacifism is in the West the missiles are in the East they're posed NATO deployment of Cruise and Pershing missiles they advocated so-called equidistance not to the east not to the west but loyal to ourselves and they argued for what they called nonviolent social defense of the sort Norwegians had used against the Nazi occupation in the Second World War and the Czechs had done so successfully after the Prague Spring had been crushed by Soviet tanks in other words abject total premeditated surrender to say the peace movement was a gift to the Kremlin would be understating the matter it was heavily penetrated by Eastern Bloc intelligence the Kremlin financed it and local Communist Party stamped out anything remotely critical of the Soviet bloc if the Greens had got their way the European half of the Atlantic alliance would have become detached as he would have effectively lost the protection of the American nuclear umbrella in short the West would have lost the Cold War for the German greens being on the wrong side of the Cold War turned out to be a career enhancing move by 1997 there were nine red-green coalition at state level in Germany and in 1998 the first red-green coalition was being formed in Berlin two years later the German parliament passed the Renewable Energy Act by giving the highest feed-in tariffs to the most inefficient renewable technologies the Renewable Energy Act put Germany on its path to energy insanity the renewable energy law had not been included in any party manifesto or in the election campaign the MPS voting on it didn't know what was in the bill by over rewarding Solek Heidi Germany ended up with more soda capacity than any other country in the world and um jace solar manufacturing boom in China where Germany led the rest of Europe followed at German insistence European leaders agreed the renewables energy directive thereby extending Germany's renewable energy policies to the rest of Europe as I put it in the book the greening of Europe was the price the West paid for winning the Cold War energy vendor energy transformation the word Germans use is the word Germans used for their end of their road to energy ruin a more accurate term would be energy deformation the forced uptake of renewable energy taught technologies is the opposite of the creative destruction described by Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter in what he called the essential fact about capitalism rather it is an example of destructive destruction at the hands of the state through overt and covert subsidies and regulations of one kind or another I devote quite a few pages to analyzing the destructive economics of renewable energy and pull apart the deceptions used by the Obama administration to justify the clean power plan but for now I'd like to make a direct point when you put green ideology and environmentalists in charge of energy policy the outcome is certain it will be a car crash in 2004 the Greens energy minister and formerly communist Jurgen Tritton said the energy vendor would cost Germans the equivalent of a scoop of ice cream on their monthly energy bills nine years later the crazed Christian Democrat successor reckoned the cost could amount to one trillion euros nearly 1.2 trillion dollars that's some ice cream systematic deceit is not a bug it's a feature of the propaganda put out by the climate industrial complex in the book I quote a revealing speech made by made in 1986 by top German civil servant to his fellow government bureaucrats if the official was disarmingly candid about the use of what he called empty phrases to push for the environmental agenda ecologically equilibrium was an example a phrase he said quite rightly that was meaningless another was the claim that ecology and the economy were not in conflict I myself have made this claim knowing it to be less than truthful just remember that whenever you come across claims about green growth or clean energy job bonanzas as a total contrast of this dissimulation and deceit I'd like to mention the books code edit khatib Fred singer is a model of a great scientist a seeker of scientific understanding and a great communicator of it well for featuring in the climate Wars fred was on a panel of scientists convened by the Reagan White House that reviewed the science of acid rain they'd also had a leading role in our masking the spurious science of the nuclear winter another example of where the people who've been on the wrong side of the Cold War emerged as victors in the post Cold War era with the exception of two individuals virtually all the prominent scientists who signed up to the Soviet inspired nuclear winter scare subsequently became prominent supporters of the global warming's consensus now people who are now deferred to by governments around the world I'd like to quote quote what to me is a priceless exchange involving Fred on February 24th 1994 ABC's Nightline gave airtime to Al Gore in his allegations about who is funding climate sceptics before reminding viewers that the cosmologists Carl Sagan had predicted massive environmental damage from the elektra alleged climatic effects of the first Iraq war Fred on the other hand predicted if there were any smoke it would clear quickly as Ted Koppel told viewers quote the record shows that in this instant incidence dr. Sagan was wrong and dr. singer was right before going on to accuse our gore of quote resorting to political means to achieve what should ultimately be resolved on a purely scientific basis which brings me to what the historian Peter Gay wrote wrote in his classic book on the enlightenment what he calls the science of freedom the most important science I think for us that there is the enlightened despots of the 18th century believed they knew better than the people and how they should be governed to govern gay rights quote the ruler must have at his disposal a perfectly obedient to mock a bureaucracy all the knowledge it is possible for him to gather and unlimited authority to translate his programs into law do I need to say that this is what the climate industrial complex demands of the United States a form of government Americans rejected in 1776 in favor of the truths embodied in the direct Declaration of Independence America's uniqueness lies not in the fact of its independence but that it became independent to create something without precedent government dedicated to the principle of liberty the demands of the climate industrial complex and the president preservation of Liberty are incompatible the science is settled we're told the government must act but global warming demands more it demands that citizens agree and requires of those who don't to hold their tongue and that dissent be silenced thus global warming harbors a strong impulse toward the governing modes of the absolutist and the political culture of the totalitarian at stake then is what makes America unique ultimately global warming is a battle for America's soul and that's why we're here today to fight it thank you we want to have plenty of time for questions so if you have a question please raise your hand wait for the microphone to arrive so you can introduce yourself to our audience and then ask your question who has the first question with the audience when the Soviet Union fell my name is Mike I'm an investor and over-the-hill retired physicist interested in climate change global warming and all that kind of stuff when the Soviet Union fell they listed lots of confessional you made a good case that that this was that the Soviet Union and the International communist conspiracy shall we say had a role in this but it was absent in all of the bad things they admitted doing to us in the papers that were released at that point is there any documentation that our can our turncoat spies that said they were that global warming and some of these other things that are in your book were kind of left-wing conspiracies I accept their left-wing conspiracy but were like like we're talking about trials about the election it was a direct collusion I think global warming actually was was not was not Soviet inspired it clearly came from Sweden and we was cooked up by Swedes as I say because they have this huge nuclear power program however what is the case is that during the 1970s the Soviet Union the Kremlin exploited environmentalism after the Helsinki Accords which which for the West was about human rights there was some language in there about the environment so the Soviets tried to shift the argument it's actually about the environment it's about a common home so Brezhnev made a speech on the environment they signed up to a UN pact on an acid ray they didn't mean they had to do anything but it was all about demonstrating to credulous people the greens in the West that actually the Soviet was on the Soviets were on the right side of the environment on the nuclear winter the evidence is very clear a defector actually said this was this was an drop-offs and the KGB's proudest achievement was was the nuclear winter scale which was then taken up by Carl Sagan and lots of American scientists there was a conference in Washington to play up this threat and they basically put it was really to undermine the Reagan administration and the nuclear arms arms build-up and as I say if they got their way if the scientist had got their way the outcome of the Clerc Cold War would have been very different okay yes right here on the back and then we'll go to you a Paul Larkin Heritage Foundation I've read a few newspaper accounts that surmise that the Russians are involved currently in efforts to fund opposition to fracking for the same sort of long-term purpose that you described is there evidence that that is actually going on I think it's certainly the case that the Soviet the the Russian sorry I have a huge interest in preventing fracking which is after all done immense damage to to their economy in terms of the collapse in in in natural gas prices and turning America from an importer of natural gas to an exporter I don't have I don't review the evidence of that in in in this book what I do highlight is have the green oligarchs of Silicon Valley people are Eric Schmidt of Google have funded anti-fracking campaigns and thereby essentially waging war on the hydrocarbon economy that America the heartland of America the middle of America depends upon and thrives on and if you like you've got an economic civil war within American capitalism with the the to case really against against the middle I haven't read your book your name I just I haven't read your book but from what you said over here it's about the first time he might close to eight years old life that somebody has need and stitch some are related together issues to reject some whether is scientific or real or not matter the question is that is global warming happening or not if it's not happening or happening doesn't have anything to do with the weather it was done by German green ordered Soviet Union or anti-war movement or anything that my question is that is global warming actually happening or not okay thank you very much as it happens I've got a paper that's being produced being published today by a different thing town which looks at the science and particular what scientists themselves say about the certainties or rather than lack of certainty regarding climate science and the global warming hypothesis well but the key thing I think in the book I think motive is important I think why this why this issue was put on the agenda is it is a isn't it important thing to understand but the prototype of the global warming scare in my view is is acid rain and there it's very very clear that the science turned out to be wrong the National Academies the National Academy of Sciences here and in Canada Sweden and Britain they all said the science on acid rain is more certain than his own global warming and it they turned out to be wrong and when the truth emerged what was very interesting was that the EPA just was pushing through the Clean Air Act Amendments through Congress they suppress that finding they demonized and blacken the name of the scientist Edward Krug who who was the principal scientist involved in discovering that actually the the consensus science on the acid rain was completely wrong and to this day none of those academies have retracted or admitted they got the science wrong so I put a big question mark over the credibility of these organizations when they say the science is settled because there's a previous analog where they said that and they got it wrong say that one of the issues we're dealing with here is the the fear-mongering that's going on in other words going to this gentleman's question we started off with a global warming crisis and then it became global warming and then it became climate change in other words they're saying they seem to be admitting themselves that we don't have a crisis here whatever the change in weather is and don't you think that fear-mongering is a tactic that they're using to try to affect the government's policies yeah not only do I think that I demonstrate I demonstrate in the book that actually that was that was absolutely embedded right from the word go so there were two conferences just as the IPCC was being formed in Bellagio and villach in in Austria and and Italy and what clear from the documents is that to get government to change policy they had to reverse engineer a catastrophe because they said unless the discount rates mean that discount raise traditional discount rates are so low that you can't actually show that there's that much damage occurring from climate change therefore you have to assume that there's going to be a great big catastrophe down the road and that enables you to justify the policies that it won't they wanted so it's absolutely the case is you can read from the read from the document summary summarizing them but they reversed engineered a catastrophe to get the policy response they wanted right okay any other questions here well let me then say as we bring this to a close we have copies of this book available for you green tyranny exposing the totalitarian roots of the climate industrial complex and you know one of the things that I think is important for us to keep in mind in the United States of America is we want to encourage people to seek truth that is what we're all about and I might say one of the most impressive things to me in addition to just the content of the book is that when you get to page 267 there are notes footnotes that reference other research material and that goes on to page 314 in other words if you want to seek truth the first thing you should do is get a copy of this book and then read it and then go to the footnotes and get those materials and read them in other words don't be suckered by fear-mongering scare tactics and politicians get Rupert Darwin's book green tyranny and seek truth let's all thank Rupert for being here today [Applause]

31 thoughts on “Green Tyranny: Exposing the Totalitarian Roots of the Climate Industrial Complex

  1. I remember acid rain like yesterday. The world would starve within a few years. Er, how's that been going, eh ?

  2. I had hoped to hear a balanced view on man made global warming instead I got a lot of hateful right wing bull-shit from a crazy man who believes having a decent humanitarian welfare and health service means communism. What a load of SHIT !!!!!

  3. Earth changing since day one. How much do the cavemen owe for the ice age? How much does Noah owe for the great flood? It's all about money and control. What's next Soylent Green coming true.

  4. Was there any family relationship between Olof Palme and Rajani Palme Dutt. RPD was a prominent member of the Communist Party of Great Britain. His father was a Bengali ( Dutt/Dutta , a well-known Bengali name) and his mother a Swede. RPD was clever , but regarded in the CPGB as a Stalinist. OP had a different socialist stance, of course. I had some contact with RPD in his last years in the 1970s; but that is another story. I also met and interviewed his brother Clemens Dutt, a very pleasant and agreeable retiree living on the coast in Kent, England . I was interested at the time in Communism in India in the inter-war period.

  5. It's too weaken western culture by taking away our power source that made America great, fossil fuel. Liberals are on the war path to deny jobs, make it hard to create jobs, take away guns, scream "racism" everywhere they can, give preschoolers hormone blockers, gay marriage, abortion on demand, perverts reading to our children, erase history, erase Christianity, core curriculum, socialized everything, dumb down education and teach the glorious benefits of socialism….shall I go on?

  6. S.S. yes, but is it "anthropomorphic"? And It seems many people are unaware of The hands of Rockefeller et al all over this

  7. It's all about power and control. If the CO2 is rising, it could very well be because of the massive deforestation being carried out, with our rain forest. Thousands of acres per year, for decades, has to have some effect, on the environment. It's been known for at least a century that, the rainforest, is an ecological engine of our global climate. Plants consume CO2 and give off oxygen. Being we breathe oxygen, to survive, one would think, that would be our main concern overall.

  8. everybody who doesnt belive in climate change is an idiot. Even if there was no climate change a green revolution would be completely beneficial on most aspects. come at me noobs

  9. min 18: Note that the Finns in 1939 with just over 3.5 million people fought back against the socialist invaders from the east (the USSR) showing their own intense nationalism and rejection of surrendering sovereignty and their frank rejection of immigration (by the Russians)…Now however, their leaders see other leaders elsewhere as their reference group, not their own people and thus have begun to endorse the dissolution of their culture, their own subjection to non-Finnish authorities (EU and UN regulations)

  10. I am German. I agree. You can see maoist roots in almost anything greens do here.
    Grassroots of the party are the true believers and tolerate no disagreement

  11. Good and informative presentation… And although I'm glad that the lady is a Conservative, she's a bit stiff and rude.

  12. i will never forget when a scientist was being interviewed in the amazon where he had worked for some time .the interviewer was starting to rabbit on about climate change the scientist didn't respond to his false assumptions and calmly stated we need to grow more trees . a politician was being interviewed in australia and was rabbiting on about how they were going to fix global warming when a voice came from the audience , '' what about growing more trees !! '' to which the polly replied , '' yes we could do that '' and continued the scam that is climate change .

  13. Create a global 'problem' and you need a global solution. Sell the lies to the people that the government must tax them more, and control people's behaviour all for the supposed greater good of saving the planet. It all about controlling the people to ultimately set up a global one world government to address the global climate 'problem'. The sheeple accept it hook, line and sinker. It's all a hoax with a very evil intent – set up the global antichrist leader for supreme power. Look at the back of the US $1 note – Novus ordo seclorum (New secular world order), pyramid with eye of Lucifer/Horus (Satan). Wake up people, their plan for centuries is unfolding through lies and deception.

  14. this poor soul is simply unbearable in his ignorance and arrogance (and inability to read even one of his own sentences without stumbling over his own words). makes me sick to be of the same species…

  15. Great speech, the club of Rome central role in the environmental movement and plans for a One world government , (in there writing from the 1960 )when it was formed . Was not mentioned, is this in the book.

  16. Not sure it I agree about what he says, "Hitler getting something right when he said the future is wind power."  About as dangerous as all his other ideas!

  17. I have an open mind and am willing to listen to both sides… but aren't The Heritage Foundation the guys who tried to convince people, unforgivably late in the game, that smoking doesn't cause cancer?

  18. 'Climate change denial is evil'

    It's just a matter of time until the professional liar-deniers will have to answer for their crimes against humanity, so enjoy your 30 silver pieces while you still can.

  19. There has always been climate change! The sun causes climate and it’s cyclical. Warmth doesn’t kill, cold does and cold is much more normal for this planet. CO2 is plant food and we could use more of it in our atmosphere.

  20. In the 1960's it was that we were entering a mini 'ice age'! I have been around long enough to remember the scares that never came true and the ECOLOGY FLAG OMG! Do you notice the nonsense from WIKIPEDIA that YOUTUBE/GOOGLE force down our throats!?

  21. "Global warming" is not science, it's genocide, it's backwardness, poverty and misery for billions of people.

  22. The green movement was always a socialist and national socialist and Democratic agenda. It’s a good old concept. Nazis were bad but not every single idea they ever had was bad. That’s ridiculous. Nazis were big on health for their people so they had an incentive to do some things very well. In summary, Nazis did some wonderful things for evil reasons.

  23. There is a new element to the 'green' movement. It's called 'extinction rebellion'. And these are people who are willing to block traffic and get arrested, but we know they will move onto more violent means. They want action through government force.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *