Democrats Unveil Resolution On Impeachment Proceedings | The Last Word | MSNBC

Democrats Unveil Resolution On Impeachment Proceedings | The Last Word | MSNBC


>>>IN 1974 JAMES SINCLAIR>>>IN 1974 JAMES SINCLAIR BECAME THE FIRST LAWYER IN BECAME THE FIRST LAWYER IN HISTORY TO DEFEND A PRESIDENT IN HISTORY TO DEFEND A PRESIDENT IN AN IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION ON AN IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION ON TELEVISION. TELEVISION.>>THE MAIN ISSUE THAT HAS TO DO>>THE MAIN ISSUE THAT HAS TO DO WITH WATERGATE AND IN SUBSTANCE WITH WATERGATE AND IN SUBSTANCE IT SEEMS CLEAR TO ME AND THERE’S IT SEEMS CLEAR TO ME AND THERE’S NO ARGUMENT THE PRESIDENT WOULD NO ARGUMENT THE PRESIDENT WOULD DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT IN ADVANCE. DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT IN ADVANCE.>>JAMES ST. CLAIR LOST THAT>>JAMES ST. CLAIR LOST THAT ARGUMENT WHEN THE PRESIDENT WAS ARGUMENT WHEN THE PRESIDENT WAS FORCED TO TURN OVER TAPES HIS FORCED TO TURN OVER TAPES HIS BOSTON LAW FIRM WITH THE BOSTON LAW FIRM WITH THE ADMIRATION OF THE ENTIRE LEGAL ADMIRATION OF THE ENTIRE LEGAL COMMUNITY NATIONWIDE. COMMUNITY NATIONWIDE. HE CONTINUED WISDOM HE CONTINUED WISDOM DISTINGUISHED CAREER AS A TRIAL DISTINGUISHED CAREER AS A TRIAL ATTORNEY AND LECTURER AT HARVARD ATTORNEY AND LECTURER AT HARVARD LAW SCHOOL. LAW SCHOOL. HE WAS DEFENDING A GUILTY HE WAS DEFENDING A GUILTY CLIENT, BUT HE DID IT WITH CLIENT, BUT HE DID IT WITH RESPECT FOR THE SERIOUSNESS OF RESPECT FOR THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE IMPEACHMENT PROCESS, RESPECT THE IMPEACHMENT PROCESS, RESPECT FOR THE RULES, AND RESPECT FOR FOR THE RULES, AND RESPECT FOR THE COURT DECISIONS. THE COURT DECISIONS. THAT FORCED HIS CLIENT TO THAT FORCED HIS CLIENT TO RELEASE THE DAMNING EVIDENCE RELEASE THE DAMNING EVIDENCE AGAINST HIMSELF THAT ENDED THE AGAINST HIMSELF THAT ENDED THE KNOCKS PRESIDENCY. KNOCKS PRESIDENCY. RUDY GIULIANI IS NO JAMES ST. RUDY GIULIANI IS NO JAMES ST. CLAIRE. CLAIRE. DONALD TRUMP’S LAWYERS ARE THE DONALD TRUMP’S LAWYERS ARE THE WORST LAWYERS WHO HAVE EVER WORST LAWYERS WHO HAVE EVER DEFENDED A PRESIDENT OF THE DEFENDED A PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES. THEIR LEGAL ARGUMENTS ARE THEIR LEGAL ARGUMENTS ARE CARTOONS OF LEGAL ARGUMENTS. CARTOONS OF LEGAL ARGUMENTS. NOTHING EMBARRASSES THEM. NOTHING EMBARRASSES THEM. WHEN THEIR ARGUMENTS GETTING WHEN THEIR ARGUMENTS GETTING CRUSHED, THEY JUST MAKE MORE CRUSHED, THEY JUST MAKE MORE FRIVOLOUS ARGUMENTS. FRIVOLOUS ARGUMENTS. THE RESOLUTION THE HOUSE OF THE RESOLUTION THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES WILL PASS THIS REPRESENTATIVES WILL PASS THIS WEEK OUTLINING THE IMPEACHMENT WEEK OUTLINING THE IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES IN THE INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES IN THE VARIOUS COMMITTEES WILL GIVE VARIOUS COMMITTEES WILL GIVE DONALD TRUMP’S LAWYERS SPECIAL DONALD TRUMP’S LAWYERS SPECIAL RIGHTS IN THE JUDICIARY RIGHTS IN THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE HEARINGS, INCLUDING COMMITTEE HEARINGS, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO CROSS EXAMINE THE RIGHT TO CROSS EXAMINE WITNESSES, BUT THOSE RULES ALSO WITNESSES, BUT THOSE RULES ALSO GIVE CHAIRMAN OF THE JUDICIARY GIVE CHAIRMAN OF THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE UNIQUE POWER, POWER COMMITTEE UNIQUE POWER, POWER THAT WAS NEVER THOUGHT NECESSARY THAT WAS NEVER THOUGHT NECESSARY IN AN IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDING IN AN IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDING BEFORE THIS ONE. BEFORE THIS ONE. IF THE TRUMP LAWYERS BRING THEIR IF THE TRUMP LAWYERS BRING THEIR OBSTRUCTIONIST GAME INTO THE>>>THE COMMITTEE SHALL REPORT>>>THE COMMITTEE SHALL REPORT TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SUCH RESOLUTIONS, ARTICLES OF SUCH RESOLUTIONS, ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT, OR OTHER IMPEACHMENT, OR OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS AS IT DEEMS RECOMMENDATIONS AS IT DEEMS PROPER. PROPER. THAT SENTENCE APPEARS IN THE THAT SENTENCE APPEARS IN THE 1974 HOUSE RESOLUTION 1974 HOUSE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE HOUSE JUDICIARY AUTHORIZING THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE TO CONDUCT AN COMMITTEE TO CONDUCT AN IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION INTO IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION INTO RICHARD NIXON. RICHARD NIXON. THAT SAME SENTENCE APPEARS THAT SAME SENTENCE APPEARS VIRTUALLY WORD FOR WORD 24 YEARS VIRTUALLY WORD FOR WORD 24 YEARS LATER IN THE 1998 HOUSE RUKS LATER IN THE 1998 HOUSE RUKS AUTHORIZING THE IMPEACHMENT AUTHORIZING THE IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION OF PRESIDENT BILL INVESTIGATION OF PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON. CLINTON. AND THAT SENTENCE APPEARS WORD AND THAT SENTENCE APPEARS WORD FOR WORD IN THE IN THE HOUSE FOR WORD IN THE IN THE HOUSE RESOLUTION ON IMPEACHMENT THAT RESOLUTION ON IMPEACHMENT THAT WILL BE BROUGHT TO THE HOUSE WILL BE BROUGHT TO THE HOUSE FLOOR FOR A VOTE ON THURSDAY. FLOOR FOR A VOTE ON THURSDAY. THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE WILL ADOPT NEW RULES TO COMPLY WILL ADOPT NEW RULES TO COMPLY WITH THAT RESOLUTION THAT GRANT WITH THAT RESOLUTION THAT GRANT THE PRESIDENT AND THE THE PRESIDENT AND THE PRESIDENT’S LAWYERS SPECIAL PRESIDENT’S LAWYERS SPECIAL RIGHTS DURING THE JUDICIARY RIGHTS DURING THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE HEARINGS ON COMMITTEE HEARINGS ON IMPEACHMENT, INCLUDING THE RIGHT IMPEACHMENT, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO OBJECT TO QUESTIONS ASKED OF TO OBJECT TO QUESTIONS ASKED OF ANY WITNESS, AND THE RIGHT TO ANY WITNESS, AND THE RIGHT TO QUESTION ANY WITNESS. QUESTION ANY WITNESS. BUT THE FINAL PROVISION IN THE BUT THE FINAL PROVISION IN THE NEW RULES OF THE HOUSE JUDICIARY NEW RULES OF THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE FOR IMPEACHMENT COMMITTEE FOR IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS SAYS THAT IF THE HEARINGS SAYS THAT IF THE PRESIDENT BLOCKS WITNESSES FROM PRESIDENT BLOCKS WITNESSES FROM TESTIFYING AND REFUSES TO TESTIFYING AND REFUSES TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, QUOTE, THE PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, QUOTE, THE CHAIR SHALL HAVE THE DISCRETION CHAIR SHALL HAVE THE DISCRETION TO IMPOSE APPROPRIATE REMEDIES, TO IMPOSE APPROPRIATE REMEDIES, INCLUDING BY DENYING SPECIFIC INCLUDING BY DENYING SPECIFIC REQUESTS BY THE PRESIDENT OR HIS REQUESTS BY THE PRESIDENT OR HIS COUNSEL UNDER THESE PROCEDURES COUNSEL UNDER THESE PROCEDURES TO CALL OR QUESTION WITNESSES. TO CALL OR QUESTION WITNESSES. JOINING US NOW IS GIULIANI JOINING US NOW IS GIULIANI EPSTEIN, FORMER CHIEF COUNSEL EPSTEIN, FORMER CHIEF COUNSEL FOR IT HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE FOR IT HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE WHO WAS THERE DURING THE CLINTON WHO WAS THERE DURING THE CLINTON HEARINGS. HEARINGS. EJ, THEY DIDN’T NEED RULES LIKE EJ, THEY DIDN’T NEED RULES LIKE THIS FOR JAMES ST. CLAIRE. THIS FOR JAMES ST. CLAIRE. THEY DIDN’T NEED RULES LIKE THIS THEY DIDN’T NEED RULES LIKE THIS FOR PRESIDENT CLINTON’S LAWYERS FOR PRESIDENT CLINTON’S LAWYERS BECAUSE THEY PRESUMED REASONABLE BECAUSE THEY PRESUMED REASONABLE BEHAVIOR IN THESE HEARINGS. BEHAVIOR IN THESE HEARINGS. BUT THAT’S NOT THE CASE WITH BUT THAT’S NOT THE CASE WITH RUDY GIULIANI AND THE TRUMP RUDY GIULIANI AND THE TRUMP LAWYERS. LAWYERS.>>NO, IT’S NOT.>>NO, IT’S NOT. AND I THINK THIS VUL VERY CLEAR. AND I THINK THIS VUL VERY CLEAR. THE PRESIDENT WILL BE GIVEN THE PRESIDENT WILL BE GIVEN EVERY RIGHT TO INTERVENE, BUT HE EVERY RIGHT TO INTERVENE, BUT HE WON’T BE GIVEN THAT RIGHT IF HE WON’T BE GIVEN THAT RIGHT IF HE DECIDES THAT HE WILL DENY THE DECIDES THAT HE WILL DENY THE COMMITTEE AND BY EXTENSION, THE COMMITTEE AND BY EXTENSION, THE PUBLIC ITSELF, A LEGITIMATE PUBLIC ITSELF, A LEGITIMATE INFORMATION. INFORMATION. THERE’S SOME OTHER THINGS THERE’S SOME OTHER THINGS THEY’VE DONE IN THESE RULES, I THEY’VE DONE IN THESE RULES, I THINK, THAT ARE INTERESTING. THINK, THAT ARE INTERESTING. ONE IS THE COMMITTEES THAT ARE ONE IS THE COMMITTEES THAT ARE BEING EXCLUDED FROM THIS BEING EXCLUDED FROM THIS PROCESS. PROCESS. THEY INCLUDE THE OVERSIGHT THEY INCLUDE THE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE AND THE FOREIGN COMMITTEE AND THE FOREIGN AFFAIRS COMMITTEE. AFFAIRS COMMITTEE. THEY’RE NOT PART OF THIS AT ALL. THEY’RE NOT PART OF THIS AT ALL. AND GUESS WHAT, THERE ARE A AND GUESS WHAT, THERE ARE A COUPLE MEMBERS OF THE OVERSIGHT COUPLE MEMBERS OF THE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE WHO ARE AMONG THE COMMITTEE WHO ARE AMONG THE REPUBLICAN FLAME THROWERS, JIM REPUBLICAN FLAME THROWERS, JIM JORDAN AND MARK MEADOWS ARE KEPT JORDAN AND MARK MEADOWS ARE KEPT OUT OF THE PROCESS THIS WAY. OUT OF THE PROCESS THIS WAY. LEE ZELDIN OF THE FOREIGN LEE ZELDIN OF THE FOREIGN AFFAIRS COMMITTEE, ANOTHER FLAME AFFAIRS COMMITTEE, ANOTHER FLAME THROWER IS KEPT OUT OF THE THROWER IS KEPT OUT OF THE PROCESS THIS WAY. PROCESS THIS WAY. IT’S ANOTHER WAY IN WHICH IT’S ANOTHER WAY IN WHICH THEY’RE TRYING TO KEEP THIS FROM THEY’RE TRYING TO KEEP THIS FROM BECOMING A CIRCUS. BECOMING A CIRCUS. LASTLY, IT REALLY APPEARS THAT LASTLY, IT REALLY APPEARS THAT THEY’VE LEARNED FROM THE MUELLER THEY’VE LEARNED FROM THE MUELLER HEARING AND THAT THE FIVE-MINUTE HEARING AND THAT THE FIVE-MINUTE RULE EVERYBODY ASKS A QUESTION RULE EVERYBODY ASKS A QUESTION FOR FIVE MINUTES AND YOU MOVE FOR FIVE MINUTES AND YOU MOVE ON, REALLY DOESN’T GIVE YOU ON, REALLY DOESN’T GIVE YOU GREAT HEARING. GREAT HEARING. SO IN THE INTELLIGENCE SO IN THE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE, AND, BY THE WAY, ADAM COMMITTEE, AND, BY THE WAY, ADAM SCHIFF IS THE KING OF THE HILL SCHIFF IS THE KING OF THE HILL IN THIS PROCESS THE WAY THIS IN THIS PROCESS THE WAY THIS RULE IS WRITTEN BECAUSE ALL OF RULE IS WRITTEN BECAUSE ALL OF THE HEARINGS GO THROUGH HIM. THE HEARINGS GO THROUGH HIM. IN INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE THERE IN INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE THERE WILL BE A “B”BLOCK OF 90 MINUTES WILL BE A “B”BLOCK OF 90 MINUTES EACH AND THEY CAN DELEGATE THAT EACH AND THEY CAN DELEGATE THAT TO A COMMITTEE STAFF MEMBER. TO A COMMITTEE STAFF MEMBER. SO YOU CAN HAVE A CONSISTENT SO YOU CAN HAVE A CONSISTENT LINE OF INQUIRY AND NOT HAVE IT LINE OF INQUIRY AND NOT HAVE IT ALL CAUGHT UP THE WAY IT HAS — ALL CAUGHT UP THE WAY IT HAS — WAS SO OFTEN IN THE MUELLER ERA. WAS SO OFTEN IN THE MUELLER ERA.>>WE’RE GOING TO BE SEEING MORE>>WE’RE GOING TO BE SEEING MORE OF BARRY BURKE, THE COUNSEL WHO OF BARRY BURKE, THE COUNSEL WHO ASKED QUESTIONS OF THAT ASKED QUESTIONS OF THAT COMMITTEE BEFORE BECAUSE THIS COMMITTEE BEFORE BECAUSE THIS RULE ALLOWS THE COMMITTEE RULE ALLOWS THE COMMITTEE COUNSEL TO BE ASKING THE COUNSEL TO BE ASKING THE QUESTIONS FOR 45 MINUTES AT A QUESTIONS FOR 45 MINUTES AT A TIME. TIME. BUT I WANT TO GET YOUR REACTION BUT I WANT TO GET YOUR REACTION TO WHAT CONTROL YOU THINK THIS TO WHAT CONTROL YOU THINK THIS RULE GIVES CHAIRMAN NADLER IN RULE GIVES CHAIRMAN NADLER IN THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE. THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE.>>WELL, LOTS OF CONTROL.>>WELL, LOTS OF CONTROL. BUT YOU EXPECT THAT ON THE BUT YOU EXPECT THAT ON THE COMMITTEE CHAIR. COMMITTEE CHAIR. IN 1998, WE GAVE THE — THE IN 1998, WE GAVE THE — THE REPUBLICANS GAVE THE WHITE HOUSE REPUBLICANS GAVE THE WHITE HOUSE EXACTLY THE PROCEDURAL EXACTLY THE PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES THAT THE DEMOCRATS GUARANTEES THAT THE DEMOCRATS ARE NOW GIVING TO THE TRUMP ARE NOW GIVING TO THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE. WHITE HOUSE. IT’S ALMOST WORD FOR WORD IN IT’S ALMOST WORD FOR WORD IN TERMS OF PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES. TERMS OF PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES. AND AFTER THOSE WERE VOTED ON, AND AFTER THOSE WERE VOTED ON, THEY WERE VOTED ON BY VOICE VOTE THEY WERE VOTED ON BY VOICE VOTE IN THE COMMITTEE. IN THE COMMITTEE. HERE YOU ACTUALLY HAVE A HOUSE HERE YOU ACTUALLY HAVE A HOUSE RULE IN PLACE, WHICH IS MUCH RULE IN PLACE, WHICH IS MUCH STRONGER THAN YOU HAD IN 1998. STRONGER THAN YOU HAD IN 1998. AFTER THOSE RULES WERE PUT IN AFTER THOSE RULES WERE PUT IN PLACE, TOM MOONMY AND MYSELF HAD PLACE, TOM MOONMY AND MYSELF HAD TO MEET WITH THE WHITE HOUSE TO MEET WITH THE WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL TO DISCUSS IS IT COUNSEL TO DISCUSS IS IT IMPLEMENTATION OF THOSE RULES. IMPLEMENTATION OF THOSE RULES. WHILE THERE WAS INTENSE WHILE THERE WAS INTENSE DISAGREEMENT DURING THE 1998 DISAGREEMENT DURING THE 1998 IMPEACHMENT, DURING THE MEETING IMPEACHMENT, DURING THE MEETING WHEN WE HAD TO NEGOTIATE HOW THE WHEN WE HAD TO NEGOTIATE HOW THE RULES WOULD BE CARRIED THROUGH, RULES WOULD BE CARRIED THROUGH, THERE WAS COMPLETE COOPERATION THERE WAS COMPLETE COOPERATION BY THE WHITE HOUSE. BY THE WHITE HOUSE. THE CLINTON WHITE HOUSE THE CLINTON WHITE HOUSE COOPERATED EVERY STEP ALONG THE COOPERATED EVERY STEP ALONG THE WAY, EVEN THOUGH THERE WAS WAY, EVEN THOUGH THERE WAS INTENSE DISAGREEMENT ON THE INTENSE DISAGREEMENT ON THE OVERALL IMPEACHMENT, AND THAT’S OVERALL IMPEACHMENT, AND THAT’S TOTALLY CONTRARY TODAY. TOTALLY CONTRARY TODAY. REPUBLICANS HAVE PAINTED REPUBLICANS HAVE PAINTED THEMSELVES IN A CORNER BY THEMSELVES IN A CORNER BY RELYING ON THE PROCESS ARGUMENT RELYING ON THE PROCESS ARGUMENT THAT NANCY PELOSI HAS NOW TAKEN

100 thoughts on “Democrats Unveil Resolution On Impeachment Proceedings | The Last Word | MSNBC

  1. No matter how or why the Democrats arrange the impeachment hearings, the Republicans will continue to complain and invent their ever-moving goal posts of sorry excuses.

  2. Lawrence is a professional in another level. Calling out the facts n skanks in a classy way but hilarious at the same time. I love it!

  3. This is what happens when you elect someone with no experience and you have a President that elects cronies who also have no experience. He treats it like his own business and forgets he works for the country. And guess what happened to a lot of his own businesses. How many times did he declare bankruptcy.

  4. Unfortunately the lying obstructor of justice and conspiracy nut Devil Nunes will be included in the process as the ranking minority member. However, the more motormouth lunatics that are excluded the better.

  5. The circus arrived in Washington when Trump became president, then the head clown, Trump, hired more clowns such as Guliani.

  6. The moment they start an inpeachment investigation…..all political decisions ,laws, offers and what not coming from any presifend should be stopped. This fkr is going to get us to war with our own allies and he is still free to do whatever the fk he wants. If then the president does not get impeached then he/she resumes their job. Why is this not the case?

  7. Here's the ad the demicrats will run the day after the SENATE finds Trump not guilty.

    Didnt get what you wanted in the impeachment? Vote him out.

    And they will.

  8. Lol lol lol. They say the walls are closing in…. NOPE
    John Mellencamp said it well….
    When the walls come tumblin' down
    When the walls come crumblin' crumblin'
    When the walls come tumblin' tumblin' down…
    Y'ALL are talking nonsense.
    Stop the propaganda.

  9. Nancy Pelosi has been in Congress since 1987, crossed every “T” & dotted every “I” with these impeachment procedure rules. There will be military officers present with the Sergeant at Arms. Republicans will walk out when they cannot act up. She wants them to do just that.

  10. Democrats have a lot of Backside to cover in terms of health of areas they represent and poor performance by way of results.
    Baltimore Rodent Plague, Power Grid down in California, Detroit Pension Failure, Chicago Gun Violence, undrinkable Flint Michigan and New Jersey Water…etc.
    No wonder they are trying to spin up a load of B.S.
    We will call them out for poor performance in 2020 and see who gets the "Last Word" by way of Election Results.
    Results matter.

  11. Trump is the best president in the history of the planet he is doing what the people want patriots aren’t followers we’re leaders and can read the transcript for our selfs nothing there there opinions about the call don’t matter the facts do Hillary and her minions must go to jail for there crimes against USA or sooner or later civil war will break out

  12. At some point, since the Republican leadership has shown no leadership at all in hemming in both Mr. Trump and its various rogue Congressmen and Senators, the entire party will have to be viewed as a rogue party hostile to the rule of law and our Constitution. It will be at that point that "rogue" behavior must be viewed for what it actually is– criminal behavior– and handled accordingly.

  13. The gop has shot themselves and their fearful leader in the foot, ran their mouths without forethought of the outcome of their demands watch what you wish for….it is comical watching the gop scrambling to come up with their next talking points what a bunch of losers…..Impeach Indict Jail trump! SAVE OUR COUNTRY AND THE REST OF THE WORLD FROM trump and the cowardly gop thugs! Vote as many loser gop as possible out in 2020.

  14. After this hoax is proven to be another BS story maybe some of you people living in this bubble will finally wake up.
    We have the transcript of the phone conversation. Everything else doesn’t matter.
    The senate will go to the transcript and vote
    All this is a show for democrats. That’s it
    This hoax started with a phone conversation and it will end with the phone conversation.
    The democrats can bring 100 people in to talk.
    It will all go back to the conversation.
    How desperate are you people. Comical

  15. All decent Americans thank Prez Trump for pursuing and killing Al-Baghdadi–the mini-Hitler, torturer and killer of Kayla Mueller and many others. Those cowards who do not give thanks are total human excrement. Yes–all you Trump haters out there–may misfortune come to

    you and your families for inciting hatred and dividing America. The Dem media is complicit in trying to overthrow our President–hopefully they pay appropriate consequences.

  16. It's plain as the NOSE on YOUR FACE with Russia dancing around tRUMP
    HE HAS TO KNOW WHAT HAS/IS GOING ON: "wannabe DICTATOR/KING" I get
    replays from tRUMP votes WHAT is what THEY want to LIVE in a
    DICTATORSHIP IN THE USA

  17. So the Republicans won and semi proper procedures will be followed. Nice spin though. But the process is still not truly proper.

  18. MSNBC corrupt fake news media anchor Lawrence knows the impeachment gimmick is actually an stage coup to overthrow our duly elected president Trump since day one of his presidency.
    The American people are not stupids.
    We are at WAR against the spy traitors in the W.H.,the fake news media and the rabid radicalized socialists democrats .
    We the people stand by president Trump !

  19. The Russians have basically infiltrated our government through Trump. Trump was OBVIOUSLY compromised from the start. Get this orange shitbag out of office and put him in jail.

  20. HOW DARE THAT WITCH PELOCI, TO SET TRAPS TO BRING DOWN OUR PRESIDENT!! WHEN WE ALL KNOW THAT OBAMA'S CABINET HAD SET THE FAKE DOSSIER BEFORE THE NEW INCOMING PRESIDENT! WE ALL KNOW THEY ARE THE REAL GUILTY ONES! PELOCI YOU ARE A PATHETIC LYER, CRYING OVER BIDENS SON FOR LAUNDERING MONEY FROM UKRAINE, OVER A SIMPLE CALL, THAT'S WHAT WE'RE SUPPOSE TO DO INVESTIGATE!! N NOW A FAKE IMPEACHMENT IN THE COVER OF DARKNESS WITHOUT FOLLOWING THE CONSTITUTION OR OUR LAWS??? YOU HAVE COMMITTED TREASON N YOU WILL WILL GO DOWN!!

  21. All of Trump's attorneys' "cartoons of legal arguments" are not the lawyers' true "legal arguments" but Trump's own dictated foolishness that he thinks will tie up the courts in legal procedures to give him time to "muddy up" the waters of the impeachment inquiry. Remember there is no team – HE is the team. But in the process, the "Team" will take the whole White House and Country down with him. He plans to commit "harakiri" without any noble reason to do so.

  22. national security surveillance state CIA democrat Pete Buttigieg is the establishment’s latest anti Bernie Sanders corporate media pushed candidate

  23. All Trump's r a joke !! Trump is using them he's guilty as sin !! They will be embarrassed for being so stupid 😠

  24. Read these comments, very little of merit. 40 years ago there was some meaningful dialogue. These comments aren't worthy of socialism.

  25. The polls show the American people do not go along with the. Witch hunt. They are satisfied with the recorded phone call. MSNBC is still on Rachel mad cow Russia collusion lies and deceit to America. Murder Joe stories

  26. "Dems introduce another totally partisian non-impeachment 'impeachment' bill to satisfy their deranged anti-Trump base who are freaking out over the lefts historically unelectable and radical candidate field and the Dems total lack of legislative record to run on". Truth translation.

  27. f the truth indicts Trump, why don't the lying Schiff Dems allow actual cross-examination and out the fake hack "whistleblower"?  Maybe cuz' Schiff's office manufactured the entire thing with a rabid anti-Trump,  paid Dem hack?

  28. Democrats plan is to try to wipe out the competition by because they know they can't win on policies, they haven't worked on any.

  29. It's good that strict rules will be implemented. Past public hearings have been little more than shouting matches, posturing, and vacuous ranting, in other words, a circus. They should treat this process with the gravity and importance that it deserves and not allow anyone to try to derail or disturb the process.

  30. Donald has attacked our MILITARY
    Donald has attacked our justice department
    Donald has attacked our intelligence agencies
    Donald has attacked members of Congress
    Donald has attacked our VETERANS.
    PEOPLE HAVE THE AUDACITY TO CALL DONALD A PATRIOT HES A TRAITOR AND A DISGRACE TO THIS COUNTRY

  31. A Abuse of Power
    B Bribery.. Use the word in the Constitution!!!!
    C Corruption
    F. Federal Campaign laws
    O obstruction of congress

  32. IMPEACHMENT already or we are all doomed trump is the definition of corruption and lies and crimes against humanity and our amazing COUNTRY

  33. He deserves to get locked up he has so many different things going on outside of the white house and public in courts and cases and he needs THE BIG HOUSE NOT THE WHITE HOUSE

  34. Ever notice how all you Trumpists can do is quote Trump and Fox News, instead of the many patriots, soldiers, decorated veterans and diplomats who are actually stepping forward and speaking out and proclaiming treason? Wonder, why is that?

  35. The Senate should promptly dismiss any phony impeachment conclusion submitted by the House. We CAN NOT have secret closed door hearings where all due process is dismissed outright, as having any legitimacy in our Democracy. Too many soldiers died defending our laws, our values, our way of life. You want to impeach someone? Then do it right, as was with the Clinton and Nixon impeachment process. I was in court this week and saw a lawyer for the defendant questioning the plaintiff in open court. That is the American way.

  36. I like watching how far a network will go to not report certain stories. Every week Trump is doomed and every week we see Trump get the last laugh.

  37. Lawrence please consider that Giuliani is not stupid. I think of Giuliani more like that court musician in the movie Amadeus. a movie about Mozart. Giuliani deep in his repulsive soul believes that he and not Trump should be President. It kills Giuliani deep in his repulsive, repugnant soul that Trump and not he is President. I earnestly believe everything Giuliani has done is to secretly sabotage Trump. Trump is too stupid and vain to see it; Trump and Giuliani deserve each other.

  38. Facing Impeachment, Trump Leans On AG Bill Barr Like A Criminal Defense Attorney! INSTEAD TO BEING ATTORNEY GENERAL???? A TITLE NOT FIT TO What he has been doing!!!

  39. OMG! " The cartoons of legal arguments" That has been the most damning statement I have heard in a really long time. I guess time is up! Perhaps I should say in the way Trump likes to be portrayed as a gangster, The Jig is up.

  40. I've read the transcripts. Have You? I understood it all. I now see nothing like I have been told. I suggest You read it. This is not worth the time of day people. There is no there there. Right after the "Ya, but do me a favor" I heard about – they talk about 2016 and crowdstrike – there's nothing about Biden until way later in the conversation that had changed subjects twice in the meantime. It's plainly obvious that the Dems are just picking a phrase or two from Trump – not telling us the context AGAIN and the trying to convince the mindless of a narrative that is not real ….again. What a crock this is.

  41. Rudy,🎤🎶a message to you Rudy,🎤ah, 🎤🎶ah ah,🎤stop your messing around, 🎤ah ah ah, better think of your future, oops, to late.🌝

  42. What are the duties of US Marshals? Can't they pick up those obstreperous witnesses and bring them to the hearings? Preferably in handcuffs!

  43. I can't see what the republicans pick to complain about next.🤔 I'm sure it will be well thought-out and legitimate. 😆😅

  44. So many adjectives so few facts. It's obvious to anyone that DimLibs are trying to figure a way to impeach without evidence. smh.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *